|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 100, 99-107, Copyright © 1990 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
RW Bunton, AA Xabregas and AP Miller
An experimental study to assess the performance of currently available
pericardial substitutes is described with particular reference to their use
after coronary artery bypass grafting. Seventy-two ewes, (six groups of 12
animals) had a 7 x 5 cm portion of the pericardium excised. Each group had
either the defect left open, primarily resutured, replaced with coarse
Dexon No. 2 mesh (American Cyanamid Co., Danbury, Conn.), replaced with
fine Dexon No. 8 mesh, replaced with glutaraldehyde-preserved bovine
pericardium, or replaced with polytetrafluoroethylene 0.1 mm surgical
membrane. Six animals from each group were assessed at 3 months and the
remaining six animals were assessed at 6 months. The open-defect and
resutured groups served as control animals. None of the substitutes proved
superior to the open- defect group in the prevention of chest
wall/lung-to-pericardium adhesions at either 3 or 6 months. The limitations
of the animal model in assessing this aspect of substitute performance are
discussed. Whereas the bovine pericardium, polytetrafluorethylene, and
Dexon No. 8 mesh groups were superior to the resutured group in the
prevention of pericardium-to-epithelium adhesions in the area of the patch,
this advantage was lost at 6 months when resuturing proved as effective as
polytetrafluoroethylene and bovine pericardium. In all groups there was
little tendency to produce generalized pericardial adhesions. At 3 months
Dexon No. 8 mesh and bovine pericardium produced the least amount of
significant epicardial reaction. In two animals in the 3- month
polytetrafluoroethylene group and in one animal in the 6-month
polytetrafluoroethylene group, a "fibrous peel" was encountered on the
inner surface of the patch, which had also become adherent to the
epicardium and had obscured the underlying anatomy. At 6 months the
open-defect, resutured, and bovine pericardium groups had produced no
significant epicardial reaction. In one animal at 6 months the bovine
pericardium had become markedly thickened and degenerative. We do not
recommend routine closure of the pericardium after coronary artery
operations with any of the substitutes investigated in our study.
ARTICLES
Pericardial closure after cardiac operations. An animal study to assess currently available materials with particular reference to their suitability for use after coronary artery bypass grafting
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Naito, T. Shin'oka, N. Hibino, G. Matsumura, and H. Kurosawa A novel method to reduce pericardial adhesion: A combination technique with hyaluronic acid biocompatible membrane. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2008; 135(4): 850 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Yoshioka, Y. Saiki, K. Sakuma, A. Iguchi, T. Moriya, Y. Ikada, and K. Tabayashi Bioabsorbable Gelatin Sheets Latticed With Polyglycolic Acid Can Eliminate Pericardial Adhesion Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 864 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tsukihara, S. Takamoto, K. Kitahori, K. Matsuda, A. Murakami, R. J. Novick, and Y. Suematsu Prevention of Postoperative Pericardial Adhesions With a Novel Regenerative Collagen Sheet Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 650 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kajihara, M. Eto, Y. Oishi, N. Boku, K. Kuwahara, N. Nishiguchi, C. Kotani, and S. Morita Three-layered synthetic pericardial substitutes reduce postoperative pericardial adhesions J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2005; 129(1): 18 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Saha, W. McEwan, F. A Frizelle, and H. Singh Limiting Pericardial Adhesions after Coronary Artery Bypass: Experimental Study Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2004; 12(1): 61 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Soga, S. Takai, T. Koyama, Y. Okamoto, T. Ikeda, K. Nishimura, M. Miyazaki, and M. Komeda Attenuation of adhesion formation after cardiac surgery with a chymase inhibitor in a hamster model J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2004; 127(1): 72 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Leprince, M. Rahmati, N. Bonnet, V. Bors, A. Rama, Ph. Leger, I. Gandjbakhch, and A. Pavie Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes to wrap surfaces of circulatory support devices in patients undergoing bridge to heart transplantation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 19(3): 302 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Okuyama, C. Y. Wang, E. A. Rose, K. E. Rodgers, E. Pines, G. S. diZerega, and M. C. Oz Reduction of retrosternal and pericardial adhesions with rapidly resorbable polymer films Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 68(3): 913 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kageyama, K. Suzuki, K. Matsushita, H. Nogimura, and T. Kazui Pericardial closure using fascia lata in patients undergoing pneumonectomy with pericardiectomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1998; 66(2): 586 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hurle, M. de la Vega, J. J. Feijoo, V. G. Ray, C. Abad, G. Ponce, and J. L. Perez-Arellano Effect of Physical Protection on the Mesothelial Integrity of the Pericardium Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1997; 63(4): 1091 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Mitchell, R. Lee, G. T. Hodakowski, K. Neya, W. Harringer, C. R. Valeri, and G. J. Vlahakes Prevention of postoperative pericardial adhesions with a hyaluronic acid coating solutionExperimental safety and efficacy studies J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1994; 107(6): 1481 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |