JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vesely, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vesely, I.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 101, 90-99, Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Analysis of the Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. Effects of "zero- pressure" fixation

I Vesely
John P. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.

The long-term performance of current-design porcine xenograft valves has not been satisfactory. These valves are generally fixed at "low pressures" of about 3 to 5 mm Hg. The Medtronic Intact (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.) valve is fixed at "zero pressure" and is proposed as a better alternative to existing xenograft valves. A mechanical analysis of this valve has been carried out to determine if the Intact valve differs significantly from the low-pressure fixed xenograft. Twelve circumferential strips of tissue 5 mm wide were cut from the leaflets of four clinical-grade Intact valves. Their stress/strain, stress relaxation, and flexural behavior were examined mechanically and histologically. The Intact valve was more extensible than the low-pressure fixed xenograft (22% versus 12% strain, p less than 0.001), relaxed faster (p less than 0.001), and was more pliable than the xenograft (p less than 0.05). It did not, however, buckle less than did the low-pressure fixed xenograft during enforced bending, and it buckled significantly more than did fresh porcine aortic valve tissue (p less than 0.001). The Intact valve also relaxed significantly more slowly than did the fresh tissue (p less than 0.05). Its bending stiffness had a stronger dependence on leaflet thickness than the bending thickness of fresh tissue had (p less than 0.001) but a weaker dependence than the bending thickness of the low-pressure fixed xenograft material had (p less than 0.001). The Intact valve demonstrated a very large variability in extensibility, bending stiffness, and buckling behavior, with little correlation between these parameters. Some valves appeared to have wrinkled leaflets; others were likely fixed at different pressures. The shrinkage of the leaflet material at these low fixation pressures is likely important, since it can modify the elastic behavior of the valve cusps. Overall, the Intact valve had a more "natural" elastic behavior than had low-pressure fixed xenograft, and it should therefore experience lower stresses during normal valve function. It can be concluded that zero-pressure fixation does preserve many of the desirable stress-reducing properties of aortic valve tissue.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. B. Eichinger, I. M. Hettich, D. J. Ruzicka, K. Holper, C. Schricker, S. Bleiziffer, and R. Lange
Twenty-year experience with the st. Jude medical biocor bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1204 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
P. Stelzer
Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement: Porcine and Pericardial
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 915 - 934.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F.-C. Riess, R. Bader, E. Cramer, L. Hansen, B. Kleijnen, G. Wahl, J. Wallrath, S. Winkel, and N. Bleese
Hemodynamic Performance of the Medtronic Mosaic Porcine Bioprosthesis Up to Ten Years
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1310 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
W. B. Eichinger, F. Botzenhardt, R. Gunzinger, B. M. Kemkes, A. Sosnowski, D. Maiza, E. O. Coto, and N. Bleese
European experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2002; 124(2): 333 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
C. Huth, A. Friedl, A. Rost, and for the GELIA Study Investigator Group
Intensity of oral anticoagulation after implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic prosthesis: analysis of the GELIA Database (GELIA 4)
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2001; 3(suppl_Q): Q33 - Q38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. R. Eric Jamieson
Supplement: Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Cardiac Bioprostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1997; 64(1): 293 - 294.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Westaby, N. Amarasena, V. Long, A. Prothero, G. A. C. Amarasena, A. P. Banning, R. Pillai, and O. Ormerod
Time-Related Hemodynamic Changes After Aortic Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Xenograft
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1633 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.