JTCS Concomitant Website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendry, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keon, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hendry, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Keon, W. J.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 101, 833-838, Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

An assessment of crystalloid solutions for donor heart preservation

PJ Hendry, RS Labow, YA Barry and WJ Keon
University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa Civic Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

The optimal technique for donor heart protection remains controversial. One component of preservation is the transport solution. Although saline solution is most frequently used as a transport medium, other crystalloid solutions may be superior. Accordingly, human right atrial trabeculae contracting isometrically in vitro were used to assess five crystalloid solutions at two different temperatures (12 degrees and 4 degrees C): St. Thomas' Hospital solution, modified Krebs-Henseleit (K+ = 16 mEq/L), Krebs-Henseleit (K+ = 4.5 mEq/L, saline, and Euro-Collins. After a 24-hour preservation period the muscles were restimulated at 34 degrees C and recovery of function was monitored for 30 minutes. Recovery of developed force was not affected by temperature (p = 0.13 by two-way analysis of variance). However, St. Thomas' Hospital solution provided the best recovery of developed force (103.3 +/- 6.2% of control) compared with saline, which had the worst developed force (2.8% +/- 1.3%) (p less than 0.002). Modified Krebs-Henseleit, Krebs- Henseleit, and Euro-Collins demonstrated intermediate performance. Although there were no differences between groups in recovery of resting force, it was greater in all groups with muscles cooled to 4 degrees C (238.7% +/- 17.6% of control) (p less than 0.001). Dry/wet weight ratios did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between groups. We conclude that, of the solutions tested, St. Thomas' Hospital solution provides the best preservation of atrial myocardium. Storage in crystalloid solutions leads to impaired relaxation, which is more apparent in tissue cooled to 4 degrees C and does not appear to be solely due to increased tissue swelling.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Zhang, R. D. Furukawa, S. E. Fremes, D. A. G. Mickle, and R. D. Weisel
Effects of Butanedione Monoxime and Temperature on Prolonged Cardiac Storage
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 388 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. Orita, M. Fukasawa, S. Hirooka, H. Uchino, K. Fukui, M. Kohi, and M. Washio
Cardiac myocyte functional and biochemical changes after hypothermic preservation in vitroProtective effects of storage solutions
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1994; 107(1): 226 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.