HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lemmer, J. H. Articles by Behrendt, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lemmer, J. H., Jr Articles by Behrendt, D. M.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 101, 839-842, Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Pericardial influence on internal defibrillation energy requirements

JH Lemmer Jr, LA Faber, DJ Mariano, TA Drews, MG Kienzle and DM Behrendt
Department of Surgery, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.

There is no consensus regarding optimal positioning of patch leads for implantation of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators. We compared the energy (in joules) required for 50% and 80% successful termination of ventricular fibrillation with titanium-mesh patch leads outside intact normal pericardium and directly on the epicardium in 13 open-chest dogs. Talc was then instilled into the pericardial space to stimulate adhesion formation and pericardial thickening. After 3 weeks of recovery, thoracotomy and defibrillation testing were repeated in nine dogs with the patch leads outside the thickened, adherent pericardium. There were no significant differences in defibrillation energy requirements between locations (p greater than 0.10). In addition, a comparison of electrical impedance measurements at 10 joules showed no significant differences (p greater than 0.30). In this animal model, defibrillation energy requirements were not altered by positioning the patch leads outside normal intact pericardium rather than placing them directly on the epicardium. Furthermore, thickened, adherent pericardium interposed between the patch leads and the heart does not increase defibrillation energy requirements. These data suggest that placement of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator patch leads outside the pericardium in patients (including those with pericardial adhesions from previous cardiac operations) will not adversely affect defibrillation efficacy and thus can simplify the implantation procedure.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Lemmer Jr and T. B. Ferguson Jr Defibrillator Patch Constriction Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1996; 61(3): 1042 - 1042. [Full Text]

				T. B. Ferguson Jr Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1995; 60(4): 1115 - 1116. [Full Text]