JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walley, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keon, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walley, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keon, W. J.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 102, 187-194, Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Patterns of failure in Hancock pericardial bioprostheses

VM Walley, FD Rubens, M Campagna, AL Pipe and WJ Keon
Department of Pathology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

A series of Hancock pericardial valve bioprostheses was reviewed for cases of primary valve failure. Thirteen mitral and 10 aortic valve explants were recovered from 21 adult patients. Mitral valves had been in place for a mean of 56.4 months, and aortic valves for 53.8 months. All valves failed with cusp tears from stents (with a mean of 1.7 for mitral valves and 2.6 for aortic valves) in a predictable pattern, suggesting that wear and stress at cusp stitch sites are important in their pathogenesis. The topography of these tears is illustrated as are the less common associates of primary failure, such as calcification, fibrosis, and thrombosis. Similarities and differences of this valve's failure compared with that of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Le Tourneau, C. Savoye, E. P. McFadden, D. Grandmougin, H.-F. Carton, J.-L. Hennequin, A. Dubar, G. Fayad, and H. Warembourg
Mid-Term Comparative Follow-Up After Aortic Valve Replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Pericarbon Pericardial Prostheses
Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(90002): II-11 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. R. Aupart, P. H. Neville, S. Hammami, A. L. Sirinelli, Y. A. Meurisse, and M. A. Marchand
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERICARDIAL VALVES IN THE MITRAL POSITION: TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1997; 113(3): 492 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. R. Aupart, A. L. Sirinelli, F. F. Diemont, Y. A. Meurisse, X. B. Dreyfus, and M. A. Marchand
The Last Generation of Pericardial Valves in the Aortic Position: Ten-Year Follow-up in 589 Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1996; 61(2): 615 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.