JTCS Concomitant Website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lam, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lam, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, J.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 104, 395-400, Copyright © 1992 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses

TC Lam, M Fok, SW Cheng and J Wong
Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, China.

Leakage, tumor recurrence, and stricture formation at the anastomosis are serious problems after esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus or cardia. Because the prevalence of these postoperative complications may be affected by whether an anastomosis is made in the neck or in the chest, a comparison was made between anastomoses made at these two sites. During a period of some 7 years, we studied prospectively 411 patients who underwent resection for cancer of the esophagus or cardia and, after immediate reconstruction, had an anastomosis made in the neck or chest. The anastomotic leak rate for the neck anastomosis group was 4.3% and for the chest anastomosis group, 3.7% (p = not significant). The difference between leak rates of anastomoses fashioned by hand-sewn (5.0%) or stapled (3.0%) techniques was also not significant. The median upper resection margins in the neck and chest anastomosis groups were 4.5 cm and 3.5 cm, respectively. The corresponding rates of anastomotic tumor recurrence were 6.1% and 8.1% (p = not significant). The prevalence of benign stricture formation was significantly higher in the chest anastomosis group (19.2%) than in the neck anastomosis group (9.0%) (p = 0.002). This difference was a reflection of a significantly increased prevalence of stricture formation when an anastomosis was made by the stapler technique than with the hand-sewn method, and whereas most of the anastomoses in the neck were hand sewn (90%) the majority of those in the chest were stapled (80%). There were thus no statistically significant differences between the sites in terms of anastomotic leak and tumor recurrence rates, and the higher stricture rate in the chest anastomosis group was the result of more stapled anastomoses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
O. Y. Al-Rawi, S. H. Pennefather, R. D. Page, I. Dave, and G. N. Russell
The Effect of Thoracic Epidural Bupivacaine and an Intravenous Adrenaline Infusion on Gastric Tube Blood Flow During Esophagectomy
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 884 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J.-H. Egberts, B. Schniewind, B. Bestmann, C. Schafmayer, F. Egberts, F. Faendrich, T. Kuechler, and J. Tepel
Impact of the Site of Anastomosis after Oncologic Esophagectomy on Quality of Life -- A Prospective, Longitudinal Outcome Study
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 566 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. Akowuah, M. Junemann-Ramirez, O. Kalejayie, and J. Rahamim
Inkwelling increases benign stricture formation after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 581 - 582.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. D. Page, M. J. Shackcloth, G. N. Russell, and S. H. Pennefather
Surgical treatment of anastomotic leaks after oesophagectomy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 337 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
S. Law, D. T. K. Suen, K.-H. Wong, K.-F. Kwok, and J. Wong
A Single-Layer, Continuous, Hand-Sewn Method for Esophageal Anastomosis: Prospective Evaluation in 218 Patients
Arch Surg, January 1, 2005; 140(1): 33 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
M. Schintler, A. Maier, V. Matzi, and F.M. Smolle-Juttner
Vacuum assisted closure system in the management of cervical anastomotic leakage after gastric pull-up
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 92 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
W H Allum, S M Griffin, A Watson, and D Colin-Jones
Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer
Gut, June 1, 2002; 50 (2007): v1 - v23.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K. McManus, V. Anikin, and J. McGuigan
Total thoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal carcinoma: has it been worth it?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 16(3): 261 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Frank, R. C. Montgomery, T. E. LeVoyer, and M. Goldberg
Pleural incarceration of the gastric graft after trans-hiatal esophagectomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1999; 68(1): 250 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. F. Heitmiller, S. J. McQuone, and D. W. Eisele
The Utility Of The Pectoralis Myocutaneous Flap In The Management Of Select Cervical Esophageal Anastomotic Complications
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1998; 115(6): 1250 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-M. Collard, R. Romagnoli, L. Goncette, J.-B. Otte, and P.-J. Kestens
Terminalized Semimechanical Side-to-Side Suture Technique for Cervical Esophagogastrostomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1998; 65(3): 814 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Honkoop, P. D. Siersema, H. W. Tilanus, L. P. S. Stassen, W. C. J. Hop, and M. van Blankenstein
BENIGN ANASTOMOTIC STRICTURES AFTER TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY AND CERVICAL ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY: RISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1996; 111(6): 1141 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. D. Iannettoni, R. I. Whyte, and M. B. Orringer
CATASTROPHIC COMPLICATIONS OF THE CERVICAL ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 1995; 110(5): 1493 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.