JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Robicsek, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, J. C., 3d
Right arrow Articles by Robicsek, F.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 105, 165-167, Copyright © 1993 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Clinical significance of epicardial pacing wire cultures

JC Hastings 3d and F Robicsek
Carolinas Heart Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, N.C.

Routine cultures of epicardial pacing wires removed 5 to 10 days postoperatively were obtained in 205 adults who underwent cardiac operations through median sternotomy. The study was conducted in a double-blind prospective fashion in which clinicians were unaware of culture results. With the exception of 10 out-of-town patients who were followed up only until the day of hospital discharge, the patients were followed for at least 6 weeks (195 patients) for evidence of poststernotomy wound infections. Deep wound infection rate was slightly less than 1% in this patient population, with less than 0.5% having had superficial wound problems. Of the 205 patients, 27 had positive epicardial pacing wires cultures, with a total of 30 microbial isolates. Of 30 isolates, 26 were consistent with local skin flora (Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, and diphtheroids). Wound infection developed in none of these patients. The remaining four cultures were of either Enterobacter or Serratia. In two of these four patients deep sternal infections developed. In the remaining 178 patients whose wire cultures were negative, no deep sternal infections developed. The fact that all clinically manifested deep sternal infections were associated with positive epicardial pacing wires cultures suggests that epicardial pacing wires cultures may be useful in the treatment of high-risk patients or of those in whom deep sternal infections are suspected.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Mekontso-Dessap, S. Honore, M. Kirsch, R. Houel, D. Loisance, and C. Brun-Buisson
Usefulness of Routine Epicardial Pacing Wire Culture for Early Prediction of Poststernotomy Mediastinitis
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2004; 42(11): 5245 - 5248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. A. Chung and E. E.J. Smith
Delayed presentation of foreign body reaction secondary to retained pacing wires
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1998; 66(2): 550 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1993 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.