HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Rodney J. Landreneau Frank Pigula James D. Luketich Robert J. Keenan Peter F. Ferson Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Landreneau, R. J. Articles by Ferson, P. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Landreneau, R. J. Articles by Ferson, P. F.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1346-1351
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.

GENERAL THORACIC SURGERY

ACUTE AND CHRONIC MORBIDITY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MUSCLE-SPARING AND STANDARD LATERAL THORACOTOMIES

Received for publication May 6, 1996 Revisions requested May 24, 1996; revisions received July 25, 1996 Accepted for publication July 29, 1996. Address for reprints: Rodney J. Landreneau, MD, Section Head, General Thoracic Surgery, Allegheny General hospitaaal, Suite 302, 490 E. North Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15212.

Abstract

Introduction: Opinions differ regarding differences between totally muscle-sparing thoracotomy and standard lateral thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary resection with respect to operative time, postoperative pain and morbidity, and occurrence of chronic postthoracotomy pain syndromes and subjective shoulder dysfunction.

Methods: Three hundred thirty-five consecutive patients undergoing muscle-sparing thoracotomy (n = 148) or lateral thoracotomy (n = 187) to accomplish lobectomy for stage I lung cancer during a 40-month period were evaluated. Local rib resection was not employed, and two chest tubes were routinely used after operation in both thoracotomy groups. Epidural analgesia use was similar after operation in the two groups (muscle-sparing thoracotomy 38%, lateral thoracotomy 38%). The postoperative hospital courses and patient functional statuses at 1 year were examined.

Results: Demographic analyses demonstrated no differences between groups in age, sex, or association of significant comorbid medical illness. Although the operative time required for muscle-sparing thoracotomy was shorter, there were no differences between thoracotomy approaches in any of the other primary acute postoperative variables analyzed (chest tube duration, length of hospital stay, postoperative narcotic requirements, and postoperative mortality). The frequencies of chronic pain and shoulder dysfunction assessed 1 year after operation were also similar between thoracotomy groups.

Conclusions: The relative efficacies and rates of occurrence of acute or chronic morbidity are equivalent after muscle-sparing thoracotomy and standard lateral thoracotomy. Although muscle-sparing thoracotomy may possibly be performed more expediently, it appears that the singular advantage of muscle-sparing thoracotomy over standard lateral thoracotomy involves the preservation of chest wall musculature in case rotational muscle flaps should be needed later. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1996;112:1346-51)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Shin, C. Pancaro, C. F. Wang, and P. Gerner Low-Dose Systemic Bupivacaine Prevents the Development of Allodynia After Thoracotomy in Rats Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1587 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hutter, S. Reich-Weinberger, W. Hitzl, and H. J. Stein Sequels 10 years after thoracoscopic procedures for benign disease Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 32(3): 409 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Athanassiadi, S. Kakaris, N. Theakos, and I. Skottis Muscle-sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy: a prospective study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 496 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Maguire, J. A. Latter, R. Mahajan, F. D. Beggs, and J. P. Duffy A study exploring the role of intercostal nerve damage in chronic pain after thoracic surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 29(6): 873 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D'Andrilli, M. Ibrahim, A. M. Ciccone, F. Venuta, T. De Giacomo, D. Massullo, G. Pinto, and E. A. Rendina Intrapleural intercostal nerve block associated with mini-thoracotomy improves pain control after major lung resection. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 790 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Maguire, A. Ravenscroft, D. Beggs, and J. P. Duffy A questionnaire study investigating the prevalence of the neuropathic component of chronic pain after thoracic surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 800 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Ochroch, A. Gottschalk, J. G. Augoustides, S. J. Aukburg, L. R. Kaiser, and J. B. Shrager Pain and Physical Function Are Similar Following Axillary, Muscle-Sparing vs Posterolateral Thoracotomy Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2664 - 2670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Schreiber, S. Bleiziffer, M. Kostolny, J. Horer, A. Eicken, K. Holper, P. Tassani-Prell, and R. Lange Minimally Invasive Midaxillary Muscle Sparing Thoracotomy for Atrial Septal Defect Closure in Prepubescent Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 673 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Luketich, S. R. Land, E. A. Sullivan, M. Alvelo-Rivera, J. Ward, P. O. Buenaventura, R. J. Landreneau, L. A. Hart, and H. C. Fernando Thoracic Epidural Versus Intercostal Nerve Catheter Plus Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Randomized Study Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 1845 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Buvanendran, J. S. Kroin, J. M. Kerns, S. N. K. Nagalla, and K. J. Tuman Characterization of a New Animal Model for Evaluation of Persistent Postthoracotomy Pain Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1453 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Akcali, H. Demir, and B. Tezcan The effect of standard posterolateral versus Muscle-Sparing thoracotomy on multiple parameters Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1050 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.L. Rogers, L. Henderson, R.P. Mahajan, and J.P. Duffy Preliminary findings in the neurophysiological assessment of intercostal nerve injury during thoracotomy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 298 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Cullinane, K. L. Kovitz, and R. S. Hartz Late Mediastinal Shift After Repeated Aspiration of Postpneumonectomy Seroma Chest, March 1, 2001; 119(3): 975 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. H. Khan, K. G. McManus, A. McCraith, and J. A. McGuigan Muscle sparing thoracotomy: a biomechanical analysis confirms preservation of muscle strength but no improvement in wound discomfort Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 18(6): 656 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Rogers and J. P. Duffy Surgical aspects of chronic post-thoracotomy pain Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 18(6): 711 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Weissman Pulmonary Function After Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery Anesth. Analg., June 1, 1999; 88(6): 1272 - 1272. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Lewis, R. J. Caccavale, G. E. Sisler, J.-P. Bocage, and J. W. Mackenzie One Hundred Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgical Simultaneously Stapled Lobectomies Without Rib Spreading Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1997; 63(5): 1415 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text]