JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
M. A. Marchand
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aupart, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Marchand, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aupart, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Marchand, M. A.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:492-498
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.


SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERICARDIAL VALVES IN THE MITRAL POSITION: TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

M. R. Aupart, MD, P. H. Neville, MD, S. Hammami, MD, A. L. Sirinelli, MD, Y. A. Meurisse, MD, M. A. Marchand, MD, From the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Trousseau University Hospital, Tours, France.

Received for publication March 19, 1996. revisions requested April 22, 1996; revisions received Nov. 4, 1996 accepted for publication Nov. 8, 1996. Address for reprints: M. Aupart, MD, Unité de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Hopital Trousseau, 37044 Tours cedex, France.

Abstract

Objective: The first generation of pericardial valves was withdrawn from the market because of a high rate of premature failure. With an original design, Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves promised improved results.

Methods: One hundred fifty patients who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement, between July 1984 and December 1993, with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprostheses in our institution were followed up. Patient mean age was 62.9 ± 11.9 years. Operative mortality was 3.3%. All but three patients were followed up for an average of 4.7 years after operation, and total follow-up was 710 patient-years.

Results: At the time this article was written, over 80% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. After 10 years, actuarial survival rate was 71% (confidence limit 61% to 81%). Valve-related complications included the following: six valve-related deaths (0.8% patient-year), five thromboembolic episodes (0.7% patient-year), three cases of endocarditis (0.4% patient-year), four reoperations (0.5% patient-year), and four structural valve failures with calcification and stenosis (0.5% patient-year). After 10 years, freedom from valve-related complications was 66% (confidence limit 46% to 86%), from valve-related death 94% (confidence limit 89% to 99%), from reoperation 90% (confidence limit 82% to 98%), and from valve failure 76% (confidence limit 62% to 90%).

Conclusions: With a low rate of valve-related events at 10 years and a low rate of structural deterioration with no leaflet tear, this prosthesis is a reliable choice for patients over 60 years of age.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. Gudbjartsson, T. Absi, and S. Aranki
Mitral Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1031 - 1068.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Gao, Y. Wu, G. L. Grunkemeier, A. P. Furnary, and A. Starr
Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 384 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. W. Jamieson and M. M. Madani
The choice of valve protheses
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 389 - 390.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn
Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
W. B. Eichinger, F. Botzenhardt, R. Gunzinger, B. M. Kemkes, A. Sosnowski, D. Maiza, E. O. Coto, and N. Bleese
European experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2002; 124(2): 333 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Ohata, I. Kigawa, E. Tohda, and Y. Wanibuchi
Comparison of durability of bioprostheses in tricuspid and mitral positions
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S240 - S243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Ohata, I. Kigawa, Y. Yamashita, and Y. Wanibuchi
Surgical strategy for severe tricuspid valve regurgitation complicated by advanced mitral valve disease: Long-term outcome of tricuspid valve supra-annular implantation in eighty-eight cases
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2000; 120(2): 280 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.