|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:492-498
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.
SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE |
Received for publication March 19, 1996. revisions requested April 22, 1996; revisions received Nov. 4, 1996 accepted for publication Nov. 8, 1996. Address for reprints: M. Aupart, MD, Unité de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Hopital Trousseau, 37044 Tours cedex, France.
Abstract
Objective: The first generation of pericardial valves was withdrawn from the market because of a high rate of premature failure. With an original design, Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves promised improved results.
Methods: One hundred fifty patients who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement, between July 1984 and December 1993, with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprostheses in our institution were followed up. Patient mean age was 62.9 ± 11.9 years. Operative mortality was 3.3%. All but three patients were followed up for an average of 4.7 years after operation, and total follow-up was 710 patient-years.
Results: At the time this article was written, over 80% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. After 10 years, actuarial survival rate was 71% (confidence limit 61% to 81%). Valve-related complications included the following: six valve-related deaths (0.8% patient-year), five thromboembolic episodes (0.7% patient-year), three cases of endocarditis (0.4% patient-year), four reoperations (0.5% patient-year), and four structural valve failures with calcification and stenosis (0.5% patient-year). After 10 years, freedom from valve-related complications was 66% (confidence limit 46% to 86%), from valve-related death 94% (confidence limit 89% to 99%), from reoperation 90% (confidence limit 82% to 98%), and from valve failure 76% (confidence limit 62% to 90%).
Conclusions: With a low rate of valve-related events at 10 years and a low rate of structural deterioration with no leaflet tear, this prosthesis is a reliable choice for patients over 60 years of age.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, T. Absi, and S. Aranki Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1031 - 1068. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gao, Y. Wu, G. L. Grunkemeier, A. P. Furnary, and A. Starr Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 384 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Jamieson and M. M. Madani The choice of valve protheses J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 389 - 390. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Eichinger, F. Botzenhardt, R. Gunzinger, B. M. Kemkes, A. Sosnowski, D. Maiza, E. O. Coto, and N. Bleese European experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2002; 124(2): 333 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohata, I. Kigawa, E. Tohda, and Y. Wanibuchi Comparison of durability of bioprostheses in tricuspid and mitral positions Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S240 - S243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohata, I. Kigawa, Y. Yamashita, and Y. Wanibuchi Surgical strategy for severe tricuspid valve regurgitation complicated by advanced mitral valve disease: Long-term outcome of tricuspid valve supra-annular implantation in eighty-eight cases J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2000; 120(2): 280 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |