JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Arun K. Singh
William C. Feng
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawant, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rotenberg, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawant, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rotenberg, F.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:499-509
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.


SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

ST. JUDE MEDICAL CARDIAC VALVES IN SMALL AORTIC ROOTS: FOLLOW-UP TO SIXTEEN YEARS

Dilip Sawant, MD, FRCS(I), Arun K. Singh, MD, FRCS(C), William C. Feng, MD, DSc, Arthur A. Bert, MD, Fred Rotenberg, MD, From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and the Division of Anaesthesia, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University Medical School, Providence, R.I.

Received for publication March 27, 1996 revisions requested April 25, 1996; revisions received July 26, 1996; accepted for publication July 31, 1996. Address for reprints: Arun K. Singh, MD, FRCS(C), Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical Office Center, Suite 470, 2 Dudley St., Providence, RI 02905.

Abstract

Prosthetic aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root raises concerns of its long-term effects. Between 1978 and 1994, 270 patients received only small aortic prostheses (<= 21 mm). There were 117 men (43.3%) and 153 women (56.7%) with a mean age of 64.3 ± 11.6 years (range 19 to 87 years). The body surface areas ranged from 1.2 to 2.26 m2 (mean 1.71 ± 0.27 m2). Ninety-one percent of patients had New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms and 33% underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. The operative mortality rate was 3.3% (9 deaths) and follow-up (100%) extended from 1 to 16 years (mean 6.2 ± 3.9 years) with cumulative survival of 1676 patient-years. There were 55 late deaths (3.28% per patient-year). The linearized rates of morbidity reported as percent per patient-year were as follows: structural failure, 0%; paravalvular leak, 0.12%; prosthetic endocarditis, 0.24%; anticoagulant-related morbidity, 1.24%; and thromboembolism, 1.10%. In 89% of the survivors New York Heart Association functional performance had improved to class II or I. The actuarial survival with 95% confidence intervals at 5, 10, and 16 years was 86.9% (82.5%, 91.3%), 68.6% (60.6%, 76.6%), and 53.6% (36.6%, 70.6%), respectively. Freedom from late valve-related events (95% confidence intervals) at 10 and 16 years was as follows: thromboembolism, 91.2% (86.6%, 95.8%) and 78.3% (62.6%, 94%); anticoagulant-related morbidity, 89.1% (83.8%, 94.4%) and 81.0% (65.1%, 96.9%); and prosthetic endocarditis, 98.8% (97.5%, 100%) and 98.8% (97.5%, 100%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed age at operation, myocardial infarction, and endocarditis affected the long-term survival. The risk of sudden death irrespective of body surface area and valve size was not statistically different. Thus the long-term performance of the St. Jude Medical valve in small aortic roots is satisfactory.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. W. Emery, A. M. Emery, A. Knutsen, and G. V. Raikar
Aortic Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Cardiac Valve Prosthesis
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 841 - 856.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Stented Pericardial and Porcine Valves
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 857 - 894.
[Full Text]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
K. St. Rammos, D. G. Ketikoglou, G. J. Koullias, S. G. Tsomkopoulos, C. K. Rammos, and N. P. Argyrakis
The Nicks-Nunez posterior enlargement in the small aortic annulus: immediate-intermediate results
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 749 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. Okuyama, K. Hashimoto, H. Kurosawa, K. Tanaka, Y. Sakamoto, and K. Shiratori
Midterm results of Manouguian double valve replacement: Comparison with standard double valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2005; 129(4): 869 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. W. Emery, C. C. Krogh, K. V. Arom, A. M. Emery, K. Benyo-Albrecht, L. D. Joyce, and D. M. Nicoloff
The St. Jude Medical Cardiac Valve Prosthesis: A 25-Year Experience With Single Valve Replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 776 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. M. Gillinov, E. H. Blackstone, and L. L. Rodriguez
Prosthesis-patient size: measurement and clinical implications
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 313 - 316.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. L. Grunkemeier and Y. Wu
"Our complication rates are lower than theirs": Statistical critique of heart valve comparisons
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2003; 125(2): 290 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 825 - 856.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. J. Castro, J. M. Arcidi Jr, A. L. Fisher, and V. A. Gaudiani
Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 74(1): 31 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Hanayama, G. T. Christakis, H. R. Mallidi, C. D. Joyner, S. E. Fremes, C. D. Morgan, P. R.R. Mitoff, and B. S. Goldman
Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 73(6): 1822 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. E. Molina
Enlargement of the aortic annulus using a double-patch technique: a safe and effective method
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 667 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Kadir, B. Reeves, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Patient-prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small-size aortic valve prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1657 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J R Gonzalez-Juanatey, M V Fernandez, F G Sampedro, J M Garcia-Acuna, J B Garcia-Bengoechea, A A Cendon, and M G de la Pena
Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots
Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 149 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Medalion, B. W. Lytle, P. M. McCarthy, R. W. Stewart, K. L. Arheart, J. H. Arnold, F. D. Loop, and D. M. Cosgrove III
Aortic valve replacement for octogenarians: are small valves bad?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 699 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.