HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Robert H. Bartlett Robert J. Schreiner Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rich, P. B. Articles by Schreiner, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rich, P. B. Articles by Schreiner, R. J.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:628-632
© 1998 Mosby, Inc.

CARDIOPULMONARY SUPPORT AND PHYSIOLOGY

A prospective comparison of atrio-femoral and femoro-atrial flow in adult venovenous extracorporeal life support

Ann Arbor, Mich

Funded in part by National Institutes of Health RO1 grant HD15434.

Presented in part at the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Annual Meeting, Detroit, Mich, September 1997.

Received for publication April 6, 1998. Revisions requested June 17, 1998; revisions received June 30, 1998. Accepted for publication July 1, 1998. Address for reprints: Robert J. Schreiner, MD, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, 2920 Taubman Center, Box 0331, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0331.

Introduction: In the United States, venovenous extracorporeal life support has traditionally been performed with atrial drainage and femoral reinfusion (atrio-femoral flow). Although flow reversal (femoro-atrial flow) may alter recirculation and extracorporeal flow, no direct comparison of these 2 modes has been undertaken.
Objective: Our goal was to prospectively compare atrio-femoral and femoro-atrial flow in adult venovenous extracorporeal life support for respiratory failure.
Methods: A modified bridge enabling conversion between atrio-femoral and femoro-atrial flow was incorporated in the extracorporeal circuit. Bypass was initiated in the direction that provided the highest pulmonary arterial mixed venous oxygen saturation, and the following measurements were taken: (1) maximum extracorporeal flow, (2) highest achievable pulmonary arterial mixed venous oxygen saturation, and (3) flow required to maintain the same pulmonary arterial mixed venous oxygen saturation in both directions. Flow direction was then reversed, and the measurements were repeated. Data were compared with paired t tests and are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Results: Ten patients were studied, and 9 were included in the data analysis. Femoro-atrial bypass provided (1) higher maximal extracorporeal flow (femoro-atrial flow = 55.6 ± 9.8 mL/kg per minute, atrio-femoral flow = 51.1 ± 11.1 mL/kg per minute; P = .04) and (2) higher pulmonary arterial mixed venous oxygen saturation (femoro-atrial flow = 89.9% ± 6.6%, atrio-femoral flow = 83.2% ± 4.2%; P = .006); (3) furthermore, it required less flow to maintain an equivalent pulmonary arterial mixed venous oxygen saturation (femoro-atrial flow = 37.0 ± 12.2 mL/kg per minute, atrio-femoral flow = 46.4 ± 8.8 mL/kg per minute; P = .04).
Conclusions: During venovenous extracorporeal life support, femoro-atrial bypass provided higher maximal extracorporeal flow, higher pulmonary arterial mixed venous oxygen saturation, and required comparatively less flow to maintain an equivalent mixed venous oxygen saturation than did atrio-femoral bypass.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. C. McGee Jr., P. M. McCarthy, and N. Moazami Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 507 - 534. [Full Text]

				S. R. Carr, J. P. Cantor, A. S. Rao, T. V. Lakshman, J. E. Collins, and J. S. Friedberg Peritoneal perfusion with oxygenated perfluorocarbon augments systemic oxygenation. Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 402 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Lequier Extracorporeal Life Support in Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care: A Review J Intensive Care Med, September 1, 2004; 19(5): 243 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Moazami and P. M. McCarthy Temporary Circulatory Support Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 495 - 520. [Full Text]

				J. B Zwischenberger and S. K Alpard Artificial lungs: a new inspiration Perfusion, July 1, 2002; 17(4): 253 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Pranikoff, R. B. Hirschl, R. Remenapp, F. Swaniker, and R. H. Bartlett Venovenous Extracorporeal Life Support Via Percutaneous Cannulation in 94 Patients Chest, March 1, 1999; 115(3): 818 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]