|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:1151-1155
© 1999 Mosby, Inc.
SURGERY FOR ADULT CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE |
From the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Herzzentrum, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Received for publication Oct 26, 1998. Revisions requested Dec 9, 1998. Revisions received Feb 23, 1999. Accepted for publication Feb 26, 1999. Address for reprints: Jacques A. M. van Son, MD, PhD, Herzzentrum, University of Leipzig, Russenstrasse 19, D-04289, Leipzig, Germany.
Background: We assessed the results of a modified technique for aortic root reconstruction including preservation of the native aortic valve and sinuses.
Methods: A modified technique for reconstruction of the aortic root was devised in which the native aortic sinuses are preserved and remodeled, the diameter of the sinotubular junction is reduced, the ventriculoaortic junction is reinforced with a Dacron prosthesis, and the coronary ostia are reimplanted. Since January 1995, this modified operative technique was performed in 13 patients with a mean age of 54 ± 21 years. The median grade of aortic regurgitation was 3; in 10 patients it was caused by dilatation of the sinotubular junction, and 3 had additional annuloaortic ectasia.
Results: The aortic crossclamping time was 61 ± 18 minutes. In-hospital mortality was 2 of 13 (15.3%) patients, both deaths being related to complications of aortic dissection. In 1 patient aortic regurgitation increased to grade 3, necessitating aortic valve replacement. At a mean follow-up of 2.1 years, the remaining 10 patients had stable aortic valve function with a median grade of regurgitation of 1. The mean New York Heart Association functional class was 1.2.
Conclusions: Aortic root reconstruction with preservation of the native aortic valve and sinuses allows symmetric reconstruction of the aortic sinuses and adaptation of the diameters of the sinotubular and ventriculoaortic junctions, thus optimizing aortic valve function. Moreover, it prevents contact of the aortic valve leaflets with the Dacron graft, which may enhance the durability of the repair. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:1151-6)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. C. Miller Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: Current State of the Art and Where Are We Headed? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): S736 - S739. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Albes, U. A. Stock, and M. Hartrumpf Restitution of the Aortic Valve: What is New, What is Proven, and What is Obsolete? Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1540 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mazzola, R. Gregorini, C. Villani, and R. Giancola A simple method to adapt the height of the sinotubular junction of the De Paulis Valsalva graft to the height of the patient's sinuses in David reimplantation procedure Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 925 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Hopkins Aortic valve leaflet sparing and salvage surgery: evolution of techniques for aortic root reconstruction Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 24(6): 886 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Miller Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with the Marfan syndrome J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2003; 125(4): 773 - 778. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |