HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bech-Hanssen, O. Articles by Wallentin, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bech-Hanssen, O. Articles by Wallentin, I.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:57-65
© 1999 Mosby, Inc.

SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

INFLUENCE OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT, PROSTHESIS TYPE, AND SIZE ON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND VENTRICULAR MASS IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS

From the Departments of Clinical Physiology^a and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,^b Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

The study was supported by grants from the Göteborg Medical Society, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, and the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation.

Address for reprints: Odd Bech-Hanssen, MD, Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden.

Objectives: Two years after surgery for severe aortic stenosis, we prospectively evaluated the influence of aortic valve replacement, as well as valve type (mechanical or stented biologic) and size, on functional status, left ventricular function, and regression of mass.
Methods: Patients who received either a mechanical (n = 95) or a biologic valve (n = 42) were studied by echocardiography before the operation and after 2 years.
Results: The percentage of patients with severe dyspnea decreased from 53% to 13% (P = .001). The cardiac index increased from mean 2.6 L/min per square meter (95% CI: 2.48-2.72 L/min per square meter) to 3.1 L/min per square meter (95% CI: 2.94-3.26 L/min per square meter; P = .001). The percentage of the patients with mild-to-moderate diastolic dysfunction decreased from 43% to 18% (P = .001). The left ventricular mass index was reduced by 42.4 g (95% CI: 35-50 g; P = .001). In comparison with biologic valves of the same size, mechanical valves produced a more pronounced reduction in mass index (overall difference 21.7 g; 95% CI: 37.1-6.4 g; P = .007) and a lower mean Doppler gradient (overall difference 4 mm Hg; 95% CI: 2-6 mm Hg; P = .0002).
Conclusions: Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement had an improvement in functional status, as well as systolic and diastolic left ventricular function, and a reduction in left ventricular mass index, irrespective of prosthesis size and type. Mechanical valves are somewhat less obstructive than stented bioprosthetic valves of the same size. They are also associated with a concomitantly more pronounced reduction of left ventricular mass.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Casali, G. Luzi, M. Vicchio, P. Lilla della Monica, G. Minardi, and F. Musumeci Echocardiographic Follow-Up after Implanting 17-mm Regent Mechanical Prostheses Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2008; 16(3): 208 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Enriquez-Sarano, V. T. Nkomo, and H. Michelena Principles and Practice of Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 315 - 348. [Full Text]

				K. Taniguchi, T. Takahashi, K. Toda, H. Matsue, Y. Shudo, H. Shintani, M. Mitsuno, and Y. Sawa Left ventricular mass: impact on left ventricular contractile function and its reversibility in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 32(4): 588 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Lund and M. Bland Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 20 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ruel, H. Al-Faleh, A. Kulik, K. L. Chan, T. G. Mesana, and I. G. Burwash Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 1036 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Penta de Peppo, J. Zeitani, P. Nardi, G. Iaci, P. Polisca, R. De Paulis, and L. Chiariello Small "Functional" Size after Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: No Risk in Young to Middle-Age Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 1915 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Gjertsson, K. Caidahl, M. Farasati, A. Oden, and O. Bech-Hanssen Preoperative moderate to severe diastolic dysfunction: A novel Doppler echocardiographic long-term prognostic factor in patients with severe aortic stenosis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2005; 129(4): 890 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Otero, J. L. Pomar, J. M. Revuelta, and J. J. Rufilanchas Comparative Evaluation of Small-Size Sorin Slimline and St. Jude HP Heart Valve Prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 79(4): 1284 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gaudino, F. Alessandrini, F. Glieca, N. Luciani, C. Cellini, C. Pragliola, M. Morelli, C. Canosa, G. Nasso, and G. Possati Survival after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: does left ventricular mass regression have a clinical correlate? Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 51 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. C. Sharma, P. Barenbrug, S. Pokharel, W. R. M. Dassen, Y. M. Pinto, and J. G. Maessen Systematic review of the outcome of aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 90 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Tasca, F. Brunelli, M. Cirillo, A. Amaducci, Z. Mhagna, G. Troise, and E. Quaini Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1107 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. De Carlo, A. D. Milano, C. Nardi, G. Mecozzi, and U. Bortolotti Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of small-sized sorin bicarbon prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 337 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Salenger, J. S. Gammie, and T. J. Vander Salm Postoperative Care of Cardiac Surgical Patients Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 439 - 469. [Full Text]

				D. H. Freed, J. W. Tam, M. C. Moon, G. E.J. Harding, E. Ahmad, and E. A. Pascoe Nineteen-millimeter prosthetic aortic valves allow normalization of left ventricular mass in elderly women Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2022 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.C. Yankah, H. Klose, M. Musci, H. Siniawski, and R. Hetzer Geometric mismatch between homograft (allograft) and native aortic root: a 14-year clinical experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 835 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I Ikonomidis, A Tsoukas, F Parthenakis, A Gournizakis, A Kassimatis, L Rallidis, and P Nihoyannopoulos Four year follow up of aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis: a link between reduction in pressure overload, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and diastolic function Heart, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 309 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Ismeno, A. Renzulli, M. De Feo, A. Della Corte, F. E. Covino, and M. Cotrufo Standard versus hemodynamic plus 19-mm St Jude Medical aortic valves J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2001; 121(4): 723 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]