HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Lognathen Balacumaraswami Yasir Abu-Omar David P. Taggart Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Balacumaraswami, L. Articles by Taggart, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Balacumaraswami, L. Articles by Taggart, D. P. Related Collections Minimally invasive surgery

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:315-320
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology

A comparison of transit-time flowmetry and intraoperative fluorescence imaging for assessing coronary artery bypass graft patency

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

Received for publication July 24, 2004; revisions received October 29, 2004; accepted for publication November 23, 2004.

^_* Address for reprints: David P. Taggart, MD, PhD, FRCS, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom (Email: david.taggart{at}orh.nhs.uk).

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative graft patency assessment during coronary artery bypass grafting enables detection and immediate correction of graft failure. Currently transit-time flowmetry is used to assess graft patency on the basis of mean graft flow and derived values, such as the pulsatility index. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging, based on the fluorescence of indocyanine green dye, provides direct visual images to confirm graft patency.

METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study to assess intraoperative graft patency in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, by using an intraoperative fluorescence imaging system (SPY) and transit-time flowmetry (BF 2004). Poor flow with the intraoperative fluorescence imaging system was defined if there was an absence of fluorescence or if it did not appear within 15 seconds in the graft. A persistent mean graft flow value less than 5 mL/min and a pulsatility index greater than 5 with transit-time flowmetry were considered unacceptable and prompted graft revision.

RESULTS: We assessed the intraoperative patency of 266 grafts in 100 coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry confirmed adequate flow in 241 (91%) grafts in 75 patients (75%). Transient poor flow was detected with both intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry in 7 (2.6%) grafts in 7 (7%) patients. This subsequently proved to be adequate on repeat testing and hence did not necessitate graft revision. Both intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry confirmed persistent poor flow in 8 (3%) grafts in 8 (8%) patients that necessitated graft revision. However, in a further 10 (3.8%) grafts in 10 (10%) patients, transit-time flowmetry indicated persistently poor flows on the basis of mean graft flow and pulsatility index values, whereas the intraoperative fluorescence imaging system demonstrated satisfactory flow. These grafts were not revised.

CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, both intraoperative fluorescence imaging and transit-time flowmetry are useful to confirm intraoperative graft patency. However, in a small proportion of patients (10%), graft patency assessment with transit-time flowmetry alone might prompt unnecessary graft revision.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Balacumaraswami, Y. Abu-Omar, J. Selvanayagam, D. Pigott, and D. P. Taggart The effects of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on intraoperative graft flow in arterial and venous conduits defined by a flow/pressure ratio J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2008; 135(3): 533 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Bockeria, A. S. Karamatov, T. G. Le, and T. M. Venglinskaya Intra-operative diagnostics of surgical stenoses of coronary arteries. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2008; 7(1): 162 - 163. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Tokuda, M.-H. Song, Y. Ueda, A. Usui, and T. Akita Predicting Early Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Failure by Intraoperative Transit Time Flow Measurement Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 1928 - 1933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Balacumaraswami Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 1934 - 1934. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Balacumaraswami and D. P. Taggart Intraoperative Imaging Techniques to Assess Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2251 - 2257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Desai and S. E. Fremes Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1396 - 1397. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Tanaka, H. S. Choi, H. Fujii, M. G. Bawendi, and J. V. Frangioni Image-Guided Oncologic Surgery Using Invisible Light: Completed Pre-Clinical Development for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 13(12): 1671 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Garbade, C. Ullmann, M. Hollenstein, M. J. Barten, S. Jacobs, S. Dhein, T. Walther, J. F. Gummert, V. Falk, and F.-W. Mohr Modeling of temperature mapping for quantitative dynamic infrared coronary angiography for intraoperative graft patency control J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1344 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P.J. Budde, W. J.L. Suyker, P. T.W. Suyker, C. W.J. Verlaan, R. Meijer, C. Borst, and P. F. Grundeman Quality assessment of distal S2AS connector anastomosis by 13MHz epicardial ultrasound Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 28(6): 833 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]