HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Tirone E. David Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by David, T. E. Articles by Rakowski, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by David, T. E. Articles by Rakowski, H.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1242-1249
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

A comparison of outcomes of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiology of Toronto General Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Read at the Eighty-fifth Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, San Francisco, Calif, April 10-13, 2005.

Received for publication April 2, 2005; revisions received June 19, 2005; accepted for publication June 30, 2005.

^_* Address for reprints: Tirone E. David, MD, 200 Elizabeth St, 4N457, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada (Email: tirone.david{at}uhn.on.ca).

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in patients with degenerative disease of the mitral valve with posterior, anterior, or bileaflet prolapse.

METHODS: Patients underwent operations from 1981 through 2001: 359 had posterior (mean age, 60.4 years), 92 had anterior (mean age, 53.3 years), and 250 had bileaflet (means age, 56.4 years) prolapse. Patients with anterior prolapse were younger (P = .04) and had more associated aortic valve disease (P = .02), particularly bicuspid aortic valve disease (P < .001). Anterior prolapse was corrected by using chordal replacement with Gore-Tex sutures in most patients, but early on in this series, leaflet resection, chordal shortening, and chordal transfer were also used. Echocardiograms were done annually, and clinical follow-up was complete at a mean of 6.9 ± 4.0 years (range, 0-23 years).

RESULTS: The overall survival at 12 years was 75% ± 5%, with no difference among the posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse groups (P = .3). The freedom from reoperation at 12 years was 96% ± 2% for posterior, 88% ± 4% for anterior, and 94% ± 2% for bileaflet prolapse (P = .019). Anterior prolapse was the only independent predictor of reoperation. The freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation at 12 years was 80% ± 4% for posterior, 65% ± 8% for anterior, and 67% ± 6% for bileaflet prolapse (P = .001). Anterior and bileaflet prolapse, age, ejection fraction of less than 40%, and aortic valve disease were independent predictors of recurrent moderate or severe mitral regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS: The pathophysiology of mitral regurgitation affects the durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease, and the results of posterior prolapse are better than those of anterior and bileaflet prolapse. This study indicates that rates of reoperation underscore the rates of failure of mitral valve repair.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Falk, J. Seeburger, M. Czesla, M. A. Borger, J. Willige, T. Kuntze, N. Doll, F. Borger, P. Perrier, and F. W. Mohr How does the use of polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae for posterior mitral valve prolapse (loop technique) compare with leaflet resection? A prospective randomized trial. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1200 - 1206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Seeburger, M. A. Borger, V. Falk, T. Kuntze, M. Czesla, T. Walther, N. Doll, and F. W. Mohr Minimal invasive mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation: results of 1339 consecutive patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 760 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Zegdi, G. Sleilaty, Z. Khabbaz, M. Noghin, C. Latremouille, A. Carpentier, A. Deloche, and J.-N. Fabiani Late posterior failure after mitral valve repair in degenerative disease Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 776 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Gillinov, E. H. Blackstone, A. Alaulaqi, J. F. Sabik III, T. Mihaljevic, L. G. Svensson, P. L. Houghtaling, A. Salemi, D. R. Johnston, and B. W. Lytle Outcomes After Repair of the Anterior Mitral Leaflet for Degenerative Disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 708 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Adams and A. C. Anyanwu Seeking a Higher Standard for Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair: Begin with Etiology J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2008; 136(3): 551 - 556. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. Chitwood Jr., E. Rodriguez, M. W.A. Chu, A. Hassan, T. B. Ferguson, P. W. Vos, and L. W. Nifong Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 436 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Salvador, S. Mirone, R. Bianchini, T. Regesta, F. Patelli, G. Minniti, M. Masat, E. Cavarretta, and C. Valfre A 20-year experience with mitral valve repair with artificial chordae in 608 patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2008; 135(6): 1280 - 1287.e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Han, D. C. Peters, C. J. Salton, D. Bzymek, R. Nezafat, B. Goddu, K. V. Kissinger, P. J. Zimetbaum, W. J. Manning, and S. B. Yeon Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Characterization of Mitral Valve Prolapse J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 294 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kuntze, M. A. Borger, V. Falk, J. Seeburger, E. Girdauskas, N. Doll, T. Walther, and F. W. Mohr Early and mid-term results of mitral valve repair using premeasured Gore-Tex loops ('loop technique') Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 566 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Gillinov, E. H. Blackstone, E. R. Nowicki, W. Slisatkorn, G. Al-Dossari, D. R. Johnston, K. M. George, P. L. Houghtaling, B. Griffin, J. F. Sabik III, et al. Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve disease. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2008; 135(4): 885 - 893.e2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W.M. Fedak, P. M. McCarthy, and R. O. Bonow Evolving Concepts and Technologies in Mitral Valve Repair Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): 963 - 974. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Rodriguez, L. W. Nifong, M. W.A. Chu, W. Wood, P. W. Vos, and W. R. Chitwood Robotic Mitral Valve Repair for Anterior Leaflet and Bileaflet Prolapse Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 438 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Flameng, B. Meuris, P. Herijgers, and M.-C. Herregods Durability of mitral valve repair in Barlow disease versus fibroelastic deficiency. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2008; 135(2): 274 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Y. Chen and L. H. Cohn Mitral Valve Repair Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1013 - 1030. [Full Text]

				I. Iglesias Intraoperative TEE Assessment During Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative and Ischemic Mitral Valve Regurgitation Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2007; 11(4): 301 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Mirabel, B. Iung, G. Baron, D. Messika-Zeitoun, D. Detaint, J.-L. Vanoverschelde, E. G. Butchart, P. Ravaud, and A. Vahanian What are the characteristics of patients with severe, symptomatic, mitral regurgitation who are denied surgery? Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2007; 28(11): 1358 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Gazoni, L. M. Fedoruk, J. A. Kern, J. M. Dent, T. B. Reece, C. G. Tribble, P. W. Smith, T. C. Lisle, and I. L. Kron A Simplified Approach to Degenerative Disease: Triangular Resections of the Mitral Valve Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1658 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Rahimtoola The Year in Valvular Heart Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 23, 2007; 49(3): 361 - 374. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Suri, H. V. Schaff, J. A. Dearani, T. M. Sundt III, R. C. Daly, C. J. Mullany, M. Enriquez-Sarano, and T. A. Orszulak Recurrent mitral regurgitation after repair: Should the mitral valve be re-repaired? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2006; 132(6): 1390 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Suri, H. V. Schaff, J. A. Dearani, T. M. Sundt III, R. C. Daly, C. J. Mullany, M. Enriquez-Sarano, and T. A. Orszulak Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era. Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 819 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. D. Dreyfus, O. S. Neto, and S. Aubert Papillary muscle repositioning for repair of anterior leaflet prolapse caused by chordal elongation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 578 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Mack Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair: A Fertile Field of Innovative Treatment Strategies Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): 2269 - 2271. [Full Text] [PDF]