JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Niv Ad
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnett, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ad, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnett, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ad, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias
Right arrowRelated Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1029-1035
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

Scott D. Barnett, PhD * , Niv Ad, MD

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Va

Received for publication June 14, 2005; revisions received October 12, 2005; accepted for publication October 25, 2005.

* Address for reprints: Scott D. Barnett, PhD, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA 22042 (Email: scott.barnett{at}inova.com).

OBJECTIVE: The maze procedure is recognized as the most effective surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. In the last few years, new surgical ablation techniques were developed involving the left atrium only and modifications of the maze procedure in ablating both atria. For this study, we evaluated the evidence regarding the effectiveness of the surgical ablation procedures (biatrial and left atrial) in reducing postoperative atrial fibrillation and subsequent survival.

METHODS: MEDLINE was searched for English-language studies using the terms "maze," "atrial fibrillation," and "surgical treatment" for 1995 through August 2005. Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative survival and postoperative freedom from atrial fibrillation. Survival data were collected at 1-, 2-, and 3-year intervals. Freedom from atrial fibrillation was collected at 3 months and at 1-, 2-, and 3-year intervals.

RESULTS: Sixty-nine studies were included in this analysis. Five thousand eight hundred eighty-five total patients were involved. Patients undergoing surgical ablation (range, 90.4-85.4) demonstrated significantly greater rates of freedom from atrial fibrillation compared with those seen in control patients (range, 47.2-60.9). Survival rates among patients with biatrial surgical procedures (range, 94.9-92.8) were similar to those who had left atrial procedures only (range, 93.9-89.4). However, patients undergoing biatrial ablation (range, 92.0-87.1 vs 86.1-73.4) demonstrated superior freedom from atrial fibrillation at all time points.

CONCLUSION: Biatrial ablation surgical procedures were more effective in controlling atrial fibrillation than procedures confined to the left atrium. To encourage the use of future meta-analysis within the surgical literature, we suggest the more frequent reporting of either through Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and the reporting of rates for specific time intervals.

Abbreviations and Acronyms AF = atrial fibrillation


Related Article

Surgery for atrial fibrillation: Are we heading in the right direction?
Joao Q. Melo
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006 131: 949-951. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.