HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Jayesh Dhareshwar Thoralf M. Sundt, III Joseph A. Dearani Hartzell V. Schaff Thomas A. Orszulak Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dhareshwar, J. Articles by Orszulak, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dhareshwar, J. Articles by Orszulak, T. A. Related Collections Related Articles

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:916-924
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Aortic root enlargement: What are the operative risks?

^a Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
^b Division of Cardiovascular Anesthesia, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Read at the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the Western Thoracic Surgical Association, Sun Valley, Idaho, June 21-24, 2006.

Received for publication June 19, 2006; revisions received November 6, 2006; accepted for publication January 8, 2007.

^_* Address for reprints: Thoralf M. Sundt III, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. (Email: sundt.thoralf{at}mayo.edu).

Objective: Despite concern that small aortic valve prostheses can lead to prosthesis–patient mismatch with diminished left ventricular mass regression and poor long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement, there remains reluctance to perform aortic root enlargement procedures. We therefore examined the operative risks of aortic valve replacement with and without root enlargement.

Methods: We reviewed perioperative outcomes among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement at our institution between January 1993 and December 2001. Risk factors for operative death were evaluated by means of multivariable analysis.

Results: Of 2366 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with (1173) or without (1193) concomitant procedures, 249 (10.5%) underwent posterior root enlargement. Patients undergoing complex root enlargement (Konno–Rastan procedures) were excluded. Patients undergoing aortic root enlargement were significantly younger, twice as often female, and more often undergoing a reoperation but were similar with respect to functional class. The mean valve implant size was less in the aortic root enlargement group (21.5 ± 1.6 vs 23.2 ± 2.3 mm, P < .0001). As expected, mean crossclamp time and bypass time were somewhat longer with root enlargement. Raw operative mortality was higher with aortic root enlargement (5.6% vs 2.9%, P = .0324); however, by means of multivariable analysis, advanced functional class (P = .0020; odds ratio, 1.87), preoperative congestive heart failure (P < .0001; odds ratio, 3.22), and smaller valve implant size (P = .012; odds ratio, 1.16), but not aortic root enlargement, were independent risk factors for operative death.

Conclusions: Aortic root enlargement itself does not increase operative risk, although it is most often required among high-risk patients. Surgeons should not be reluctant to enlarge the aortic root to permit implantation of adequately sized valve prostheses.

Related Articles

Surgical techniques for posterior aortic root enlargement

Dusko Nezic, Aleksandar Knezevic, and Sasa Borovic
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008 135: 1401-1402. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]