JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Humphrey, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fosburg, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Humphrey, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fosburg, R. G.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 71, 643-647, Copyright © 1976 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

An analysis of direct and indirect measurements of left atrial filling pressure

CB Humphrey, JA Gibbons, TL Folkerth, AR Shapiro and RG Fosburg

Left ventricular function may be assessed by direct catheter measurements of left atrial pressure or by indirect measurements of pulmonary artery wedge pressure or pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure. Controversy exists as to how closely the indirect measurements correlate with true left atrial pressure and to which is the most accurate. To clarify this probelm, we studied 43 patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass. Both left atrial catheters for direct measurement and Swan-Ganz catheters were placed at the time of surgery. All patients were monitored continuously for 48 hours and hourly measurements were recorded. The resultant 1,620 left atrial pressure and pulmonary artery wedge pressure figures and 1,860 left atrial pressure and pulmonary artery end-diastolic wedge pressure measurements were subjected to computer analysis. The following conclusions have been found: (1) Pulmonary artery wedge pressure is a better indirect measure of left atrial pressure than is pulmonary artery end-diastolic wedge pressure (pooled correlation coefficient 0.629); (2) direct left atrial pressure measurement is more reliable and has fewer complications than indirect measurements; (3) there is no consistent correlation between left atrial pressure and central venous pressure (pooled correlation coefficient 0.3). A discussion of our results and the problems associated with left atrial catheters and Swan-Ganz catheters is presented.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
I. Hay, J. Rich, P. Ferber, D. Burkhoff, and M. S. Maurer
Role of impaired myocardial relaxation in the production of elevated left ventricular filling pressure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1203 - H1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. A. Javadov, K. H.H. Lim, P. M. Kerr, M.-S. Suleiman, G. D. Angelini, and A. P. Halestrap
Protection of hearts from reperfusion injury by propofol is associated with inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition
Cardiovasc Res, January 14, 2000; 45(2): 360 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1976 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.