JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hilberman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hilberman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Osborn, J. J.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 71, 711-720, Copyright © 1976 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

An analysis of potential physiological predictors of respiratory adequacy following cardiac surgery

M Hilberman, HP Dietrich, K Martz and JJ Osborn

More than 50 potential physiological and clinical predictors of postoperative respiratory adequacy were examined in an attempt to identify those few variables which, singly or in combination, best predicted the outcome of the first trial of spontaneous respiration following cardiac surgery. This trial was initiated when patients seemed hemodynamically stable and relatively alert following surgery. Analysis of data from 124 patients identified the following useful predictors: forced vital capacity, total lung capacity, and maximal mid- expiratory flow rate from preoperative pulmonary function tests; resting cardiac index from preoperative cardiac catheterization; postoperative compliance and resistance measured by a computer-based monitoring system; postoperative vital capacity per kilogram, and maximum inspiratory force, measured at the bedside prior to the weaning trial. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis indicated that vital capacity per kilogram and maximum inspiratory force were the most useful predictors, the dividing line between successes and failures being represented by a vital capacity per kilogram of 15 ml. and a maximum inspiratory force of 28 cm. H2O. Mean values of successes were 18.3 +/- 7 ml. per kilogram and 30.7 +/- 9 cm. H2O and, for failures, 11.9 +/- 4 ml. per kilogram and 24.3 +/- 8.4 cm H2O. These physiological variables assess patient effort acting upon an abnormal pulmonary system. Measurements of passive pulmonary mechanics, cardiac function, and the measurement of arterial blood gases were suprisingly poor predictors.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. Gottschalk, M. C. Hyzer, and R. T. Geer
A Comparison of Human and Machine-based Predictions of Successful Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation
Med Decis Making, April 1, 2000; 20(2): 160 - 169.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1976 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.