The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 73, 258-266, Copyright © 1977 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
The ventricular endocardial electrogram and pacemaker sensing
S Furman, P Hurzeler and V DeCaprio
During cardiac pacemaker implantation and pulse generator replacement,
unipolar, right ventricular electrograms were recorded from 133 patients
(77 at implantation and 56 at pulse generator replacement) at 200 mm. per
second with a band pass of 0.1 to 2,000 Hz on photographic paper. Each
signal was analyzed for electrogram structure, peak-to-peak voltage
deflection, ST-segment displacement, and maximum voltage deflection/time
(slew rate [dv/dt]). The QRS designation of the peripheral
electrocardiogram was used for the endocardial electrogram wave forms,
which are sufficiently similar to allow QRS terminology to be used. Of the
acute electrograms (at implantation) 58 per cent had a small Q followed by
an R wave which was 10 per cent or more of the S amplitude; 30 per cent had
an R wave less than 10 per cent of the S; all had a straight line segment,
within the QRS complex, exhibiting maximum amplitude and slew rate and a
large ST-segment elevation. In 12 per cent the Q was followed by an R wave
only. The mean voltage was 12.4 mv. +/- 5.5, the slew rate mean 2.9 v. per
second +/- 1.5, and the ST displacement 4.0 mv. +/- 2.6. All chronic (over
6 months after implantation) electrograms but one had no ST-segment
elevation, and all had an inverted T wave and a straight line segment
extending from the highest to the lowest peaks of the QRS complex. The
chronic voltage amplitude is 15 per cent lower and the slew rate 41 per
cent lower than that of the acute electrogram. The margin of amplitude and
slew rate required at implantation to maintain adequate postimplant sensing
must accommodate these changes. The possibility of satisfactory pacing
threshold associated with poor sensing exists. Knowledge of the amplitude
and slew rate allows the determination of the optimal position for
electrode placement and the sensitivity required for satisfactory pulse
generator selection, design, and operation.