HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Myerowitz, P. D. Articles by Nicoloff, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Myerowitz, P. D. Articles by Nicoloff, D. M.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 73, 625-629, Copyright © 1977 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Antibiotic prophylaxis for open-heart surgery

PD Myerowitz, K Caswell, WG Lindsay and DM Nicoloff

A randomized, prospective study of the relative effectiveness of broad- spectrum versus specific antistaphylococal antibiotic prophylaxis in patients having open-heart surgery was performed between May, 1972, and June, 1973. All patients undergoing open-heart surgery was assigned randomly (by hospital number) to receive either methicillin or cephalothin beginning the night before operation. There were 132 patients in the cephalothin group and 129 in the methicillin group. There was no statistically significant differences in age or duration of hospitalization, cardiopulmonary bypass, urinary tract drainage, or postoperative fever. There was a significant difference in the ratio of male to total patients (cephalothin group, 0.67; methicillin group, 0.52; p less than 0.02) and duration of operation (cephalothin group, 4.27 hours; methicillin group, 3.87 hours; p less than 0.05). The methicillin group had a statistically significant higher rate of urinary tract infection (cephalothin group, 3 cases; emthicillin group, 22 cases, p less than 0.05), pneumonia (cephalothin group, no cases; methicillin group, 9 cases; p less than 0.01), and episodes of sepsis and prosthetic valve endocarditis (cephalothin group, no cases; methicillin group, 11 cases, p less than 0.001). The incidence of wound infections and positive blood cultures from blood obtained immediately after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass was not significantly different between the two groups. Cephalothin has replaced methicillin as the routine prophylaxis for open-heart surgery at our institution.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. K. Fellinger, B. J. Leavitt, and J. C. Hebert Serum levels of prophylactic cefazolin during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): 1187 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Palmer, S. B. Pett, and B. F. Akl Bacterial Wound Colonization After Broad-Spectrum Versus Narrow-Spectrum Antibiotics Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1995; 59(3): 626 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. V Moran, F. Montiel, G. Acuna, J. Vergara, M. J Irarrazaval, G. Maturana, and J. Dubernet Cephradine and cefazolin plasma levels during cardiac surgery Perfusion, January 1, 1986; 1(1): 41 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]