HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hartstein, A. I. Articles by Gilbert, D. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hartstein, A. I. Articles by Gilbert, D. N.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 75, 219-223, Copyright © 1978 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Prophylactic antibiotics and the insertion of permanent transvenous cardiac pacemakers

AI Hartstein, J Jackson and DN Gilbert

Prophylactic antibiotics are prescribed frequently for patients requiring permanent transvenous cardiac pacemakers, despite a paucity of data indicating effectiveness. A 10 year retrospective analysis was performed of 298 pacemaker insertion procedures involving 204 patients. On the basis of prestudy criteria relating to timing and dosage of antibiotics, the use of prophylactic antibiotics was judged as adequate or inadequate. There were no postoperative infections in the 108 battery pack replacement procedures despite no or inadequate use of antibiotics in 49 procedures. There were nine infections in the 190 battery pack plus pacing wire procedures for an infection rate of 5 percent. There was no significant difference in infection rate between the group given prophylactic antibiotics and the group given no or inadequate prophylactic antibiotics. Of the 190 battery pack plus pacing wire procedures, no infections occurred in the 50 procedures in which surgical drains were not used (p less than 0.003). In the 140 procedures in which drains were used, there was no correlation between wound infection and absent or inadequate coverage with prophylactic antibiotics. Two severe bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus infections occurred in two patients not given prophylactic antibiotics. The other seven infections were clinically indolent. These results suggest the following: (1) There is no need for prophylactic antibiotics in battery pack replacement procedures; (2) prophylactic antibiotics may decrease the severity of infection in battery pack plus pacing wire procedures; (3) surgical drains should be avoided in battery pack plus pacing wire procedures. A prospective controlled study is necessary to confirm these results.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.-R. Movahed, B. Kasravi, and C. S. Bryan Prophylactic Use of Vancomycin in Adult Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2004; 9(1): 13 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Da Costa, G. Kirkorian, M. Cucherat, F. Delahaye, P. Chevalier, A. Cerisier, K. Isaaz, and P. Touboul Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation : A Meta-Analysis Circulation, May 19, 1998; 97(18): 1796 - 1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Rao and C. A.B. Lima Infection in Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation is Avoidable Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 1986; 20(2): 94 - 98. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. A. Chase and S. G. Pauker Recurrent Endocarditis in a Patient with a Permanent Transvenous Pacemaker Med Decis Making, January 1, 1982; 2(2): 225 - 244. [PDF]