HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chaudhary, B. A. Articles by Burki, N. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chaudhary, B. A. Articles by Burki, N. K.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 76, 33-37, Copyright © 1978 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Comparison of procedures used in the diagnosis of lung cancer

BA Chaudhary, K Yoneda and NK Burki

We have compared the relative value of various techniques used in association with fiberoptic bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of lung cancer. We analyzed the results in 114 patients who underwent diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy and in whom a definite histologic diagnosis of lung cancer was made. A comparison of the diagnostic yield from cytologic examination of prebronchoscopy and postbronchoscopy sputum and of fiberoptic bronchial biopsy, brushing, and washing was made. Over-all, bronchial washings gave the highest diagnostic yield (75.4%) and forceps biopsy the next higher (65.8%). The combination of bronchial washings and forceps biopsy gave the highest diagnostic yield (95.8%). In six patients, postbronchoscopy sputum was the only source of positive diagnostis; in 20 patients only one procedure was positive. Our results suggest that although fiberoptic bronchoscopy washings and forceps biopsy have the highest diagnostic yield, brushings and postbronchoscopic sputum examination are also important diagnostic maneuvers and should be routinely performed.