JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conti, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Digerness, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conti, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Digerness, S. B.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 76, 577-589, Copyright © 1978 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Cold cardioplegia versus hypothermia for myocardial protection. Randomized clinical study

VR Conti, EG Bertranou, EH Blackstone, JW Kirklin and SB Digerness

Seventeen of 34 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to one of two methods of myocardial preservation. With the cold cardioplegic method (Group A), a 4 degrees C. asanguineous solution with 30 mEq. of potassium per liter was infused into the aortic root for about 2 minutes immediately after aortic cross-clamping and again after about 45 minutes or when myocardial temperature rose above 19 degrees C. External cardiac cooling was provided by constant infusion of 4 degrees C. Ringer's solution into the pericardium. Seventeen patients were assigned to simple cardiac cooling by hypothermic systemic perfusion before aortic cross-clamping plus external cardiac cooling (Group B). Electromechanical activity ceased within 1 to 2 minutes in Group A but continued throughout the ischemic period in 14 patients in Group B. Myocardial temperature (mean for all observations) during aortic cross- clamping was 17.2 +/- 0.44 degrees C. In Group A and 24.0 +/- 0.70 degrees C. in Group B. Operating conditions were better in Group A. Card-ac function early postoperatively was good in both groups clinically and according to measurements, but only in the cold cardioplegic group (A) was cardiac index not adversely affected by longer cross-clamp time. Myocardial necrosis occurred in both groups but was probably less in the cold cardioplegic group. Thirteen patients (76 percent) in Group A had no electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial injury, compared with eight (47 percent) in Group B (p = 0.08). Eleven (65 percent of Group A had no or short-lived appearance of ceatine phosphokinase isoenzyme (CK-MB), compared with six (35 percent) of Group B (p = 0.08). Time-related CK-MB and SGOT mean levels were consistently lower in Group A.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1978 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.