The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 77, 908-913, Copyright © 1979 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
Comparative study of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgery. Clindamycin versus cephalothin
FD Pien, NL Michael, R Mamiya, H Takaki, S Slavish, A Bruce and RJ Moreno-Cabral
A randomized, prospective study of the relative effectiveness of
clindamycin versus cephalothin was performed in 263 adult patients having
cardiac surgery from September, 1977, to August, 1978. There were no
statistically significant differences in frequency of postoperative
infections in these two antibiotic groups. Wound infection developed in 6.5
percent of the cephalothin group and 3.2 percent of the clindamycin group.
Urinary tract infection developed in 5.6 percent of the clindamycin group
and 2.1 percent of the cephalothin group. Four bacteremic episodes occurred
in the clindamycin-treated patients, and one episode of bacteremia occurred
in a cephalothin- treated patient. No cases of endocarditis occurred during
the study. Clindamycin deserved consideration as an alternative
prophylactic agent to cephalothin for cardiac surgery.