JTCS Concomitant Website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Brownlee, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Brownlee, R. T.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 88, 573-582, Copyright © 1984 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

New generation tissue valves. Their in vitro function in the mitral position

DK Walker, LN Scotten and RT Brownlee

The in vitro function of six tissue valves from four manufacturers has been assessed. One porcine bioprosthesis (Carpentier-Edwards supra- annular) and five pericardial valves (Edwards, Hancock, Ionescu-Shiley, Ionescu-Shiley low-profile, and Mitral Medical Mitroflow) were tested. Valve function was measured in a pulse duplicator simulating conditions of sinus rhythm (60, 80, and 120 beats/min and stroke volume 70 ml) and supraventricular tachycardia (200 beats/min and stroke volume 30 ml). Under each of these test conditions, mean transvalvular pressure, regurgitation, and transvalvular energy loss were determined and used to compare valve function. The porcine valve showed the largest mean transvalvular pressure during forward flow. The total energy loss of this valve, however, was not the largest for the valves tested. The total transvalvular energy loss ranged between 3% and 12% for all valves and conditions. For all valves, energy loss and regurgitation were greatest during simulated tachycardia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. W. Borowiec, T. W. Dubiel, H.-E. Hansson, J. Landelius, S.-O. Nystrom, and J. W. Borowiec
Pericarbon Pericardial Valve Prosthesis: Midterm Results of the Aortic Valve Replacement
Angiology, January 1, 1998; 49(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1984 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.