|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 89, 136-141, Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
R Garcia-Rinaldi, JM Revuelta, L Bonnington and L Soltero-Harrington
Ten patients were treated for skin erosion and exposure of chronically
implanted pacemakers. The pulse generators had been implanted either
subcutaneously or in the subpectoral, submammary location. All patients
were treated either by primary or secondary relocation of the pulse
generator to deeper subfascial planes. Pacemakers relocated primarily to
subfacial planes healed without resurfacing. Those pacemakers relocated to
other superficial planes resurfaced but healed in a second subfascial
translocation. Bacteriologic studies on these patients revealed that the
organisms cultured or antibiotics utilized did not influence the fate of
the relocated pulse generator. The subfascial location was the only
determinant of the ultimate healing of the exposed pacemaker. We conclude
that subfascial relocation of well- functioning pacemaker generators should
be considered as an alternative to complete replacement of the unit.
ARTICLES
The exposed cardiac pacemaker. Treatment by subfascial pocket relocation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F.A.L.E. Bracke, A Meijer, and L.M. van Gelder Lead extraction for device related infections: a single-centre experience Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(3): 243 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F A Bracke, A Meijer, and L M van Gelder Pacemaker lead complications: when is extraction appropriate and what can we learn from published data? Heart, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 254 - 259. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |