JTCS St. Jude Medical
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magilligan, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magilligan, D. J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, E.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 89, 499-507, Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

The porcine bioprosthetic valve. Twelve years later

DJ Magilligan Jr, JW Lewis Jr, B Tilley and E Peterson

The porcine bioprosthetic heart valve has been commercially available since 1970 and has been the prosthetic heart valve of choice in our institution since 1971. Since that time 817 patients with 951 porcine valves have been discharged from the hospital and were available for long-term follow-up. Patient survival rates, with operative mortality excluded, were 80% +/- 1.7% (standard error) at 5 years and 68% +/- 2.7% at 10 years. Survival rates for patients with aortic valve prostheses were 78% +/- 2.8% at 5 years and 57% +/- 5.4% at 10 years; for patients with mitral valve prostheses, survival rates were 80% +/- 2.2% at 5 years and 69% +/- 3.2% at 10 years. Freedom from thromboembolism for aortic valves was 93% +/- 1.4% at 5 years and 88% +/- 2.6% at 10 years; for mitral valves the freedom from degeneration or primary tissue failure for aortic valves was 97% +/- 1.3% at 5 years and 71% +/- 7.6% at 10 years; for mitral valves these figures were 96% +/- 1.2% at 5 years and 71% +/- 4.1% at 10 years. Valves in patients 35 years of age and below had a significantly greater rate of degeneration (p less than 0.001). After 12 years' experience the porcine bioprosthetic valve has performed well with regard to patient survival and low rate of thromboembolism. For patients older than 35 years the freedom from primary tissue failure is 80% at 10 years.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
H Oxenham, P Bloomfield, D J Wheatley, R J Lee, J Cunningham, R J Prescott, and H C Miller
Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses
Heart, July 1, 2003; 89(7): 715 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomater ApplHome page
K. P. Rao and C. Shanthi
Reduction of Calcification by Various Treatments in Cardiac Valves
J Biomater Appl, January 1, 1999; 13(3): 238 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
M. Emir, G. Uzunonat, B. Yamak, A T. Ulus, M K. Gol, Z. Iscan, S F. Katircioglu, B. Mavitas, O. Tasdemir, and K. Bayazit
Effects of Pregnancy on Long-Term Follow-Up of Mitral Valve Bioprostheses
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 174 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. W. Akins, M. J. Buckley, W. M. Daggett, A. D. Hilgenberg, G. J. Vlahakes, D. F. Torchiana, and J. C. Madsen
Risk of Reoperative Valve Replacement for Failed Mitral and Aortic Bioprostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(6): 1545 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. A. Salles, E. Buffolo, J. C. Andrade, J. H. Palma, R. R.P. Silva, R. Santiago, I. S. Casagrande, and M. C. V. Moreira
Mitral valve replacement with glutaraldehyde preserved aortic allografts
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 1998; 13(2): 135 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. R. Aupart, P. H. Neville, S. Hammami, A. L. Sirinelli, Y. A. Meurisse, and M. A. Marchand
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERICARDIAL VALVES IN THE MITRAL POSITION: TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1997; 113(3): 492 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Westaby, N. Amarasena, V. Long, A. Prothero, G. A. C. Amarasena, A. P. Banning, R. Pillai, and O. Ormerod
Time-Related Hemodynamic Changes After Aortic Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Xenograft
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1633 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. D. Glower, W. D. White, A. C. Hatton, L. R. Smith, W. G. Young, W. G. Wolfe, and J. E. Lowe
Determinants of reoperation after 960 valve replacements with Carpentier-Edwards prostheses
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1994; 107(2): 381 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.