JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taliercio, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Danielson, G. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taliercio, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Danielson, G. K.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 90, 414-419, Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Permanent cardiac pacing after the Fontan procedure

CP Taliercio, RE Vlietstra, MD McGoon, CJ Porter, MJ Osborn and GK Danielson

Permanent cardiac pacing after a Fontan procedure is complicated by complex cardiovascular anatomy. Of 332 patients undergoing the Fontan procedure at the Mayo Clinic, we evaluated 15 who postoperatively required permanent pacing (mean age 16.5 years, range 4 to 31 years). Underlying congenital cardiac defects included univentricular heart in nine patients, double-outlet right ventricle in three, and tricuspid atresia in three. The indication for pacing was postoperative heart block in seven patients, congenital heart block in five, postoperative sick sinus syndrome in two, and heart block because of previous operation in one. Pacemakers were implanted immediately postoperatively in 11 patients and 12 to 57 months later in four patients. VVI systems were used in nine patients, DDD in four, AAI in one, and a Medtronic Activitrax VVI in one. All ventricular leads were epicardial. Four atrial leads were transvenous endocardial and one was epicardial. Three patients died 4, 9, and 69 months later of causes unrelated to pacing. Among the 12 survivors, mean follow-up was 34 months (range 1 to 107 months). Two patients had a total of three episodes of loss of ventricular capture because of increased chronic thresholds. Our current approach to pacing after a Fontan procedure includes (1) intraoperative placement of temporary atrial and ventricular electrodes, (2) intraoperative attachment of a permanent ventricular epicardial lead for congenital or surgically induced high-grade atrioventricular block, (3) postoperative insertion of transvenous atrial leads if dual-chamber pacing is indicated, and (4) use of programmable pulse generators with high output capability.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. I. Cohen, V. L. Vetter, G. Wernovsky, D. M. Bush, J. W. Gaynor, V. R. Iyer, T. L. Spray, R. E. Tanel, and L. A. Rhodes
Epicardial pacemaker implantation and follow-up in patients with a single ventricle after the Fontan operation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2001; 121(4): 804 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. J. Goldstein, D. Rabkin, and H. M. Spotnitz
Unconventional approaches to cardiac pacing in patients with inaccessible cardiac chambers
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1999; 67(4): 952 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.