JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, B.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 90, 541-548, Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). A critical appraisal

GS Weinstein and B Levin

The applicability of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) to clinical practice is seriously hampered by the following findings. (1) The CASS randomized study applies to only a small minority of patients with coronary artery disease. Attempts to extend the conclusions of CASS to the vast majority of patients with coronary artery disease are unjustified. (2) The high percentage of crossover of the medical group made it impossible for CASS to accomplish its primary goal of contrasting medical and surgical treatment. (3) Despite the fact that crossover of medically assigned patients created a bias against surgical treatment, the observed mortality in the surgical group was still 31% lower than that in the medical group. (4) The failure of CASS to find this difference to be statistically significant must take into account the fact that the statistical power of CASS was so low that a real difference was likely to be overlooked. (5) The conclusion that patients similar to those in the study may safely defer operation is unwarranted and violates the principles of prospective study design. In addition, CASS failed to address the possibility that deferring operation may compromise long-term survival.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.