JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breyer, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lemeshow, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Breyer, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lemeshow, S. A.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 90, 736-740, Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

A comparison of Cell Saver versus ultrafilter during coronary artery bypass operations

RH Breyer, RM Engelman, JA Rousou and SA Lemeshow

A study was performed to evaluate two blood conservation techniques that can be used with high-volume crystalloid cardioplegia. Twenty- seven patients undergoing coronary artery bypass with high-volume crystalloid cardioplegia were randomized into two groups: In 12 Group I patients the coronary sinus effluent was drained into a Cell Saver and the recovered, washed red cells were then reinfused. In 15 Group II patients the coronary sinus effluent was absorbed systemically and excess volume was removed from the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit by an ultrafilter. These two groups were compared with a retrospective control group in which the cardioplegic solution had been evacuated from the right atrium and discarded. Both the techniques resulted in significant and equivalent red blood cell conservation compared with the retrospective control group. The ultrafilter was associated with less derangement of prothrombin time. More complete potassium removal was provided by the Cell Saver.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Huet, L. R. Salmi, D. Fergusson, A. W. M. M. Koopman-van Gemert, F. Rubens, and A. Laupacis
A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Cell Salvage to Minimize Perioperative Allogeneic Blood Transfusion in Cardiac and Orthopedic Surgery
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 1999; 89(4): 861 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
T. Sakert, W. Gil, I. Rosenberg, D. Carpellotti, K. Boss, T. Williams, J. Ferneding, and I. Christlieb
Cell saver efficacy for routine coronary artery bypass surgery
Perfusion, January 1, 1996; 11(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.