JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bove, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, F. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bove, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, F. B., Jr

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 90, 750-755, Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves

EL Bove, MA Marvasti, JL Potts, MJ Reger, JL Zamora, RH Eich and FB Parker Jr

When aortic valve replacement is performed in a patient with a small anulus, significant obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract may remain. Most prostheses are obstructive in the smaller sizes, and enlargement of the aortic anulus may be required to allow placement of a larger valve. To evaluate the hemodynamic performance of two commonly used tissue prostheses, the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier- Edwards porcine valves, 22 patients with either the 19 or 21 mm size were electively studied at rest and after exercise at a mean of 15 months after operation. The resting mean transvalvular gradient for 19 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves (n = 7), 10.6 +/- 9.2 mm Hg, was significantly lower than that for 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards valves (n = 3), 33.3 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, p less than 0.01. Following exercise, the mean gradient for 19 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves rose only to 13.8 +/- 8.5 mm Hg. No exercise data were available for the 19 mm Carpentier- Edwards valve. Among patients with 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves (n = 7), the mean transvalvular gradient at rest was 5.6 +/- 9.5 mm Hg, not significantly different from that of patients with 21 mm Carpentier-Edwards valves (n = 5), 9.8 +/- 18.3 mm Hg. After exercise, the gradients rose to 16.0 +/- 10.0 mm Hg and 25.5 +/- 23.8 mm Hg for the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards valves, respectively (no statistical significance). Cardiac index was not different between groups. Gradients were not significantly higher in patients with body surface areas greater than 1.5 m2. It is concluded that the 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves possess excellent hemodynamics, even after exercise. This valve appears hemodynamically superior to the Carpentier-Edwards valve, particularly in the 19 mm size. Procedures to enlarge the aortic anulus are usually unnecessary when small Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves are used, even in patients who have large body surface areas.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 825 - 856.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Takakura, T. Sasaki, K. Hashimoto, T. Hachiya, K. Onoguchi, M. Oshiumi, and S. Takeuchi
Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 609 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. K. Choudhary, A. Mathur, P. Venugopal, B. Airan, R. Sharma, A. Bhan, A. Saxena, A. Sampath Kumar, S. K. Choudhary, A. Mathur, et al.
Prosthesis Size in Aortic Valve Replacement: Surgeon-Related Variable
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2000; 8(4): 333 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-F. Obadia, Y. A. Martelloni, O. H. Bastien, G. M. Durand de Gevigney, and J.-F. Chassignolle
Long-Term Follow-up of Small (Size 20 and 21) Medtronic-Hall Aortic Valve Prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1997; 64(2): 421 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. E. Sommers and T. E. David
Aortic Valve Replacement With Patch Enlargement of the Aortic Annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1997; 63(6): 1608 - 1612.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey, J. M. Garca-Acuna, M. V. Fernandez, A. A. Cendon, V. C. Fuentes, J. B. Garcia-Bengoechea, and M. G. de la Pena
INFLUENCE OF THE SIZE OF AORTIC VALVE PROSTHESES ON HEMODYNAMICS AND CHANGE IN LEFT VENTRICULAR MASS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF AORTIC STENOSIS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1996; 112(2): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G.-W. He, G. L. Grunkemeier, H. L. Gately, A. P. Furnary, and A. Starr
Up to Thirty-Year Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement in the Small Aortic Root
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1995; 59(5): 1056 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.