JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moores, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Daily, P. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moores, W. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Daily, P. O.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 90, 912-920, Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Quantitative evaluation of the myocardial preservative characteristics of nifedipine during hypothermic myocardial ischemia

WY Moores, JW Mack, WP Dembitsky, WH Heydorn and PO Daily

Nifedipine, a slow calcium-channel blocker, has been used to preserve myocardial function in the ischemic heart. To quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of nifedipine as a cardioplegic agent during moderate hypothermia (28 degrees C), 15 pigs were evaluated on total and right heart bypass with measurement at normothermia and after 1 hour of hypothermic ischemia of stroke volume, coronary blood flow, myocardial oxygen consumption, and lactate extraction. Myocardial tissue gases (oxygen and carbon dioxide) were continuously monitored. Animals were divided into three groups: hypothermic ischemia, hypothermic ischemia with infusion of nifedipine carrier without nifedipine, and hypothermic ischemia with nifedipine and its carrier. A significant decrease in stroke volume was seen in all three groups; however, the depression was significantly greater following hypothermic ischemia than following cardioplegia with either nifedipine or its carrier. The mean recovery value of stroke volume was highest in the nifedipine group, but this difference between nifedipine and its carrier alone did not reach statistical significance. Coronary blood flow, myocardial oxygen consumption, lactate extraction, and tissue gases failed to substantiate a significant benefit when nifedipine was compared with its carrier alone. We conclude that under these hypothermic conditions, no proven statistically significant advantage was noted in the nifedipine group when compared with the nifedipine carrier group in swine. However, both nifedipine and the carrier were superior as a myocardial preservative when compared with hypothermic ischemic arrest alone.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.