|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 91, 86-91, Copyright © 1986 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
BJ Harlan, EA Smeloff, GE Miller Jr, PB Kelly Jr, FL Junod, KA Ross and KG Shankar
The Smeloff aortic valve has remained unchanged in design and material
since 1966. To assess the long-term performance of this prosthesis, we
reviewed 394 consecutive patients undergoing elective aortic valve
replacement. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in
26.4% of these patients. Follow-up was complete in 96%; maximum follow-up
was 13.1 years (mean 4.3 years). The operative mortality was 7.4%.
Actuarial survival rate, including operative mortality, was 66.3% +/- 2.8%
at 5 years and 48.7% +/- 4.5% at 10 years. Thromboembolism for the entire
group occurred at a rate of 3.8% per patient-year. Patients who underwent
anticoagulation continuously had a rate of embolision of 1.8% per
patient-year. All patients had a 5 year embolus-free rate of 91% +/- 2% and
a 10 year embolus-free rate of 85% +/- 3%. Patients receiving
anticoagulants had a 5 year embolus-free rate of 92% +/- 2% and a 10 year
embolus-free rate of 89% +/- 3%. There was no mechanical failure or
prosthetic thrombosis in 1,690 patient-years of follow-up. The Smeloff
aortic valve has excellent long-term durability and thromboembolism is low
in patients receiving anticoagulants.
ARTICLES
Performance of the Smeloff aortic valve beyond ten years
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Gometza and C. M. G. Duran Ball Valve (Smeloff-Cutter) Aortic Valve Replacement Without Anticoagulation Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1312 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |