HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grunkemeier, G. L. Articles by Starr, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grunkemeier, G. L. Articles by Starr, A.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 91, 918-923, Copyright © 1986 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Late ball variance with the Model 1000 Starr-Edwards aortic valve prosthesis. Risk analysis and strategy of operative management

GL Grunkemeier and A Starr

The first generation of aortic ball-valve prostheses, used until 1965, was associated with poppet damage owing to fatty infiltration of the silicone rubber ball, a phenomenon termed ball variance. For the Model 1000 Starr-Edwards valves, almost all cases were discovered before 8 years. However, a review of our patients still at risk with the original valve and poppet, prompted by other recent reports of late ball variance, has shown that severe variance can exist up to 20 years after implantation. There is a relationship between the year of valve implantation and the timing and severity of ball variance for the overall series of patients surviving operation, but for the subgroup currently at risk the sample sizes are too small to detect any difference, if one still exists. Only three of 12 patients in the current subset were found to have severe variance. Simple ball change has been the operation of choice. Prophylactic reoperation is not indicated in the current subset, but patients require careful follow-up and should be considered for reoperation should symptoms develop.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Aoyagi, S. Fukunaga, K. Arinaga, Y. Yokokura, H. Yokokura, and N. Egawa Late Re-operation for Aortic and Mitral Starr-Edwards Ball Valve Prostheses Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2006; 14(6): 467 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. L. Godje, T. Fischlein, K. Adelhard, G. Nollert, W. Klinner, and B. Reichart Thirty-Year Results of Starr-Edwards Prostheses in the Aortic and Mitral Position Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1997; 63(3): 613 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text]