|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 92, 37-46, Copyright © 1986 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
GT Christakis, RD Weisel, SE Fremes, KH Teoh, JP Skalenda, CP Tong, JY Azuma, L Schwartz, LL Mickleborough and HE Scully
Although the results of contemporary aortic valve replacement are
excellent, cardiac surgeons must identify the factors that predict
postoperative morbidity and mortality to develop alternative strategies for
high-risk patients. Two hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients
undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement between 1982 and 1984 were
evaluated. Thirty-seven clinical and 13 preoperative hemodynamic variables
were analyzed by univariate and multivariate statistics to determine the
risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality. The operative
mortality was 3%, the incidence of a postoperative low output syndrome was
12%, and the incidence of a perioperative myocardial infarction was 5%. A
multivariate, logistic regression analysis found that age was the only the
only independent predictor of mortality. Three factors independently
predicted postoperative low output syndrome: age, the presence of coronary
artery disease, and the peak systolic gradient in patients with aortic
stenosis. Patients with aortic stenosis had a higher incidence of
postoperative ventricular dysfunction (17%) than those with mixed valvular
disease (9%) or aortic regurgitation (5%). Perioperative myocardial
infarction was predicted by the extent of coronary artery disease. The
incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction was higher in patients
with triple- vessel coronary artery disease (13%) and those with left main
stenosis (18%) than in patients with single- or double-vessel disease (4%)
or those without coronary artery disease (4%). Because of the higher risk
of aortic valve replacement in older patients, the risk-benefit ratio of
the operation must be carefully assessed in the elderly. Improved methods
of myocardial protection may reduce the risks for patients with aortic
stenosis and symptomatic triple-vessel coronary artery disease.
ARTICLES
Can the results of contemporary aortic valve replacement be improved?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. S. Tjang, Y. van Hees, R. Korfer, D. E. Grobbee, and G. J.M.G. van der Heijden Predictors of mortality after aortic valve replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 32(3): 469 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Connolly, J. K. Oh, H. V. Schaff, V. L. Roger, S. L. Osborn, D. O. Hodge, and A. J. Tajik Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Result of Aortic Valve Replacement in 52 Patients Circulation, April 25, 2000; 101(16): 1940 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Connolly, J. K. Oh, T. A. Orszulak, S. L. Osborn, V. L. Roger, D. O. Hodge, K. R. Bailey, J. B. Seward, and A. J. Tajik Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Prognostic Indicators Circulation, May 20, 1997; 95(10): 2395 - 2400. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Fiore, M. T. Swartz, T. G. Sharp, K. A. Kesler, H. B. Barner, K. S. Naunheim, G. L. Grunkemeier, D. A. Moroney, and G. C. Kaiser Double-Valve Replacement With Medtronic-Hall or St. Jude Valve Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1995; 59(5): 1113 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |