HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gundry, S. R. Articles by Behrendt, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gundry, S. R. Articles by Behrendt, D. M.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 92, 747-754, Copyright © 1986 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Prognostic factors in valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in infancy

SR Gundry and DM Behrendt

Aortic valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in infancy has had a high mortality. To determine the factors that influence survival, we reviewed the cases of 24 infants who underwent aortic valvotomy in the first 6 months of life (mean 4 1/2 weeks) for aortic stenosis from 1978 to 1984. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in all patients. Operative mortality was 21% (5/24), four of the five deaths occurring from low cardiac output. Analysis of preoperative factors affecting survival versus nonsurvival revealed that low ejection fraction (60% +/- 17% in survivors versus 36% +/- 2% in nonsurvivors), high left ventricular end- diastolic pressure (16 +/- 7 mm Hg in survivors versus 30 +/- 14 mm Hg in nonsurvivors), and presence of endocardial fibroelastosis (25% in survivors versus 100% in nonsurvivors) all were predictive of a poor outcome, although the small sample size indicated caution in interpreting results. Factors that did not appear to influence survival included peak systolic gradient (79 +/- 30 mm Hg in survivors versus 60 +/- 15 mm Hg in nonsurvivors) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (37 +/- 17 cm3/m2 in survivors versus 36 +/- 7 cm3/m2 in nonsurvivors). Four patients with a left ventricular end-diastolic volume below 26 cm3/m2 survived. Postoperative gradients averaged 25 +/- 21 mm Hg at 3.4 +/- 2 years' follow-up in nine recatheterized patients. Ejection fraction of these patients increased from 45% +/- 10% to 70% +/- 11% and left ventricular end-diastolic volume increased from 37 +/- 17 to 58 +/- 5 cm3/m2. Two of 17 patients have required apical-aortic conduits; all other patients are asymptomatic. We conclude that infants with critical aortic stenosis benefit from valvotomy even with impaired left ventricular function and severely reduced left ventricular dimensions and many have nearly normal hemodynamics on late follow-up.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Agnoletti, O. Raisky, Y. Boudjemline, P. Ou, D. Bonnet, D. Sidi, and P. Vouhe Neonatal Surgical Aortic Commissurotomy: Predictors of Outcome and Long-Term Results Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1585 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Colan, D. B. McElhinney, E. C. Crawford, J. F. Keane, and J. E. Lock Validation and Re-Evaluation of a Discriminant Model Predicting Anatomic Suitability for Biventricular Repair in Neonates With Aortic Stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1858 - 1865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, P. Vijay, M. D. Rodefeld, and M. W. Turrentine Closed Transventricular Aortic Valvotomy for Critical Aortic Stenosis in Neonates: Outcomes, Risk Factors, and Reoperations Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 236 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Corno Borderline left ventricle Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 27(1): 67 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. W. McCrindle, E. H. Blackstone, W. G. Williams, R. Sittiwangkul, T. L. Spray, A. Azakie, and R. A. Jonas Are Outcomes of Surgical Versus Transcatheter Balloon Valvotomy Equivalent in Neonatal Critical Aortic Stenosis? Circulation, September 18, 2001; 104(90001): I-152 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. K. Lofland, B. W. McCrindle, W. G. Williams, E. H. Blackstone, C. I. Tchervenkov, R. Sittiwangkul, and R. A. Jonas Critical aortic stenosis in the neonate: A multi-institutional study of management, outcomes, and risk factors J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2001; 121(1): 0010 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Serraf, J. D. Piot, N. Bonnet, F. Lacour-Gayet, A. Touchot, J. Bruniaux, E. Belli, L. Galletti, and C. Planche Biventricular repair approach in ducto-dependent neonates with hypoplastic but morphologically normal left ventricle J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 1999; 33(3): 827 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. I. Tchervenkov, S. A. Tahta, L. C. Jutras, and M. J. Beland Biventricular repair in neonates with hypoplastic left heart complex Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1998; 66(4): 1350 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Kovalchin, M. M. Brook, G. L. Rosenthal, K. Suda, J. I. E. Hoffman, and N. H. Silverman Echocardiographic hemodynamic and morphometric predictors of survival after two-ventricle repair in infants with critical aortic stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1998; 32(1): 237 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Hawkins, L. L. Minich, L. Y. Tani, R. W. Day, V. E. Judd, R. E. Shaddy, and E. C. McGough Late Results and Reintervention After Aortic Valvotomy for Critical Aortic Stenosis in Neonates and Infants Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(6): 1758 - 1762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]