|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 95, 761-772, Copyright © 1988 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
TB Ferguson Jr, LH Muhlbaier, DL Salai and AS Wechsler
Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after failed elective
percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty can be performed with
acceptable complication rates. Recently, however, a new class of patients
with unsuccessful angioplasty has evolved with the use of thrombolytic
therapy and emergent angioplasty as treatment for developing acute
myocardial infarction. The efficacy of surgical intervention after failure
of angioplasty in this setting has not been demonstrated. This report
compares the results of coronary bypass done emergently after either failed
elective or failed emergent angioplasty. Between March 1984 and September
1986; 1350 angioplasty procedures were performed at our institution, 393
for acute myocardial infarction. Of the 111 patients who came to operation,
42 had had unsuccessful elective angioplasty and 69 unsuccessful
angioplasty done in the clinical setting of an evolving acute myocardial
infarction detected by electrocardiographic criteria. Twenty-one of the 42
patients having unsuccessful elective angioplasty (group I) and 32 of the
69 with unsuccessful emergent angioplasty (group II) underwent emergency
coronary artery bypass grafting. A retrospective nonparametric statistical
comparison of the two groups was performed. Age, preoperative ejection
fraction, distribution of vessels undergoing angioplasty, and number of
vessels bypassed were not statistically different. All group II patients
received thrombolytic therapy, and a reperfusion catheter was used in over
half the patients in each group. Three group I and six group II patients
required a preoperative balloon pump, and half the patients in each group
required postoperative inotropic support. One patient in group I (4.7%) and
two patients in group II (6.2%) died (no significant difference). Only five
patients in group I (23.8%) and 11 in group II (34.3%) had enzymatic and
electrocardiographic evidence of an acute myocardial infarction at
discharge. Six patients in group II (15.6%) required reexploration for
bleeding, versus none in group I (p = 0.04). Nonhemorrhagic complication
rates, mean in-patient and acute care days, total hospital charges, and
blood product utilization rates were not statistically different. These
data indicate that emergency coronary artery bypass grafting can be
performed when necessary in the setting of failed emergent percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty with results comparable to coronary
bypass after failed elective angioplasty.
ARTICLES
Coronary bypass grafting after failed elective and failed emergent percutaneous angioplasty. Relative risks of emergent surgical intervention
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. P. Cannon, S. R. Mehta, and S. F. Aranki Balancing the Benefit and Risk of Oral Antiplatelet Agents in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 768 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Barakate, P. G. Bannon, C. F. Hughes, M. D. Horton, A. Callaway, and T. Hurst Emergency surgery after unsuccessful coronary angioplasty: a review of 15 years' experience Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 75(5): 1400 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mavitas, A T. Ulus, U. Yildiz, B. Yamak, C L. Birincioglu, S F. Katircioglu, C. Ozer, O. Tasdemir, and K. Bayazit Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting After Failed Angioplasty Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 195 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |