HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mullen, J. C. Articles by Teasdale, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mullen, J. C. Articles by Teasdale, S. J.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 96, 122-132, Copyright © 1988 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Postoperative hypertension: a comparison of diltiazem, nifedipine, and nitroprusside

JC Mullen, DR Miller, RD Weisel, PL Birnbaum, KH Teoh, MM Madonik, J Ivanov, DT Laidley, P Liu and SJ Teasdale
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

In previous studies, the treatment of postoperative hypertension with sodium nitroprusside induced ischemic metabolism without a decrease in coronary sinus blood flow. In contrast, the calcium antagonists diltiazem and nifedipine reduce blood pressure and may improve myocardial metabolism. A prospective randomized trial was performed in 62 patients, in whom hypertension developed (mean arterial pressure greater than 95 mm Hg) after coronary bypass procedures, to compare diltiazem (n = 22), nifedipine (n = 20), and nitroprusside (n = 20). All three agents reduced blood pressure equally (p less than 0.0001, by analysis of variance). Heart rate decreased with diltiazem (p = 0.006) but increased with nifedipine and nitroprusside (p less than 0.05). Left ventricular diastolic function (the relation between left atrial pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic volume) was not changed with the three drugs. Systolic function (the relation between systolic blood pressure and left ventricular end-systolic volume) was depressed with diltiazem (p = 0.05 by analysis of covariance) and nifedipine (p = 0.05) but not with nitroprusside. Myocardial performance (the relation between left ventricular stroke work index and end-diastolic volume) was depressed most by diltiazem (p = 0.001 by analysis of covariance), and to a lesser extent with nifedipine (p = 0.03), but not with nitroprusside. Myocardial lactate flux in response to the stress of atrial pacing decreased with nitroprusside but not with diltiazem or nifedipine (p = 0.03 by analysis of variance). Diltiazem and nifedipine are effective agents for treating postoperative hypertension after coronary artery bypass operations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Mikroulis, V. Didilis, F. Konstantinou, K. Tsakiridis, G. Vretzakis, and G. Bougioukas Diltiazem versus Amiodarone to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation in Coronary Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2005; 13(1): 47 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. van der Stroom Influence of Vasodilator Drugs on Perioperative Blood Pressure Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 1998; 2(3): 204 - 221. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Nordlander, M. Pfaffendorf, and H. B. van Wezel Calcium Antagonists for Perioperative Blood Pressure Control Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 1998; 2(3): 231 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]