HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boldt, J. Articles by Hempelmann, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boldt, J. Articles by Hempelmann, G.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 97, 832-840, Copyright © 1989 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Blood conservation in cardiac operations. Cell separation versus hemofiltration

J Boldt, D Kling, B von Bormann, M Zuge, H Scheld and G Hempelmann
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Liebig- University, Giessen, Federal Republic of Germany.

The effects of hemoconcentration performed during and after extracorporeal circulation by either centrifugation (cell separation group, n = 20) or hemofiltration (n = 20) were investigated in 40 patients undergoing elective aorta-coronary bypass grafting. Interest was focused on the quality of the blood concentrated from the blood remaining in the extracorporeal circuit and on the reaction of the patients after retransfusion of the concentrated products. Hemofiltration was easy to perform and produced whole blood quicker than the cell separation technique. Coagulation studies revealed no significant differences in heparin concentration, levels of fibrinogen and antithrombin III, or platelet counts. Various coagulation parameters tended to normalize completely and more quickly after hemofiltration than after centrifugation. None of the patients had severe bleeding postoperatively. Free hemoglobin levels were not affected by hemofiltration; elastase concentration was higher only immediately after retransfusion of the concentrated blood, with no effect on organ function. We conclude that both methods were effective means of hemoconcentration during extracorporeal circulation and in salvaging the diluted pump blood after extracorporeal circulation. Loss of plasma fraction is an important disadvantage in the centrifugation technique, which can be avoided by hemofiltration; derangement in colloid osmotic pressure and coagulation parameters was less pronounced after hemofiltration. Costs were lower, as well. Therefore, when a high volume of cardioplegic solution and two-stage cannulation are used, hemofiltration seems to be the method of choice for blood conservation during cardiac operations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Bando, M. W. Turrentine, P. Vijay, T. G. Sharp, Y. Sekine, B. J. Lalone, L. Szekely, and J. W. Brown Effect of modified ultrafiltration in high-risk patients undergoing operations for congenital heart disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 821 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Sakert, W. Gil, I. Rosenberg, D. Carpellotti, K. Boss, T. Williams, J. Ferneding, and I. Christlieb Cell saver efficacy for routine coronary artery bypass surgery Perfusion, January 1, 1996; 11(1): 71 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M Taylor The scope of the problem Perfusion, May 1, 1993; 8(1_suppl): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Tixier, D. Loisance, P. Deleuze, M. Hillion, H. Jouault, G. Bajan, and J. Cachera Blood saving in cardiac surgery: simple approach and tendencies Perfusion, October 1, 1991; 6(4): 265 - 273. [PDF]