|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 98, 170-180, Copyright © 1989 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
AS Mayne, GW Christie, BH Smaill, PJ Hunter and BG Barratt-Boyes
The aim of this study was to determine whether second-generation porcine
bioprostheses, glutaraldehyde fixed at pressures said to be less than 4 mm
Hg, exhibit more natural leaflet material properties than earlier valves
fixed at 80 to 100 mm Hg. Biaxial mechanical testing techniques were used
to compare Carpentier-Edwards SAV, St. Jude Medical BioImplant, Hancock II,
and Medtronic Intact bioprostheses (12 leaflets from four valves in each
case) with fresh porcine aortic valves and high pressure-fixed
Carpentier-Edwards 6625 bioprostheses (14 leaflets from five valves in each
case). The circumferential extensibility of leaflets from Medtronic Intact
bioprostheses and from fresh porcine aortic valves were not significantly
different (p greater than 0.05), whereas leaflets from the other
second-generation valves tested and from Carpentier-Edwards 6625 valves
were highly inextensible in the circumferential direction. The radial
material properties of leaflets from all bioprostheses differed from those
of fresh porcine aortic valves, which were very extensible with a high
pretransitional compliance. The radial extensibility and compliance of
Hancock II, St. Jude Medical BioImplant, and Carpentier-Edwards 6625
leaflets were not significantly different (p greater than 0.05). In the
radial direction, Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Medtronic Intact valve
leaflets were substantially more extensible than Carpentier-Edwards 6625
leaflets (p less than 0.01), whereas Medtronic Intact leaflets were more
compliant than all other bioprostheses. These data demonstrate (1) that
second- generation porcine bioprosthetic valves do not necessarily exhibit
more natural leaflet material properties than earlier high pressure-fixed
xenografts and (2) that Medtronic Intact valve leaflets have material
properties most closely approximating the fresh porcine aortic valve.
ARTICLES
An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second- generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques
Department of Physiology, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. B. Doty and J. R. Doty Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement: Bioprostheses Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 889 - 898. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Barratt-Boyes, W. M. Jaffe, and R. M. Whitlock THE MEDTRONIC INTACT* PORCINE VALVE: TEN-YEAR CLINICAL REVIEW J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1998; 116(6): 1005 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kadir, M. B. Izzat, P. Wilde, B. Reeves, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini Dynamic Evaluation of the 21-mm Medtronic Intact Aortic Bioprosthesis by Dobutamine Echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1997; 63(4): 1128 - 1132. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G.W. Christie Anatomy of aortic heart valve leaflets: the influence of glutaraldehyde fixation on function Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S25 - S33. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vermeulen, G. Bennink, S. Ernst, W. Jaarsma, P.A. Chevalier, and D.V. Lutz The intact porcine bioprosthesis: early world-wide clinical experience and analysis of a single institution's experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S124 - S127. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |