|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 98, 915-920, Copyright © 1989 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
RM Adamson, WP Dembitsky, RT Reichman, RJ Moreno-Cabral and PO Daily
Our 6-year experience with ventricular assist devices was reviewed to
determine variables associated with improved survival. Forty-three patients
(mean age 62 +/- 14 years) were supported after balloon pumping and
pressors proved inadequate. Twenty-eight patients could not be weaned from
cardiopulmonary bypass, 12 patients deteriorated in the intensive care unit
after cardiac surgery, and three had a bridged to transplantation. Overall,
47% (20/43) of patients could not be weaned from the ventricular assist
devices, and 26% (11/43) were weaned but died before discharge, resulting
in a hospital mortality rate of 72% (31/43). The remaining 28% (12/43) of
patients were discharged and have survived 9 to 62 months. Early
institution of ventricular assist devices (p less than 0.01), use of
biventricular support (p less than 0.01), use of ventricular assist devices
as a bridge to transplantation (p less than 0.05), and increased operator
experience (p less than 0.05) were associated with improved survival. When
patient and disease- related variables were analyzed, only age less than 60
years (p less than 0.01) and unexpectedly preoperative myocardial
infarction associated with shock (p less than 0.05) were related to
improved survival. Death was caused by insufficient ventricular recovery,
stroke, multiple organ system failure, sepsis, or a combination of these
complications. During long-term follow-up, two patients have died of
congestive heart failure, and one is significantly impaired from a stroke.
Two other patients are functional class III and seven patients are class I.
Although hospital mortality was high (72%), the use of ventricular assist
device support resulted in overall "long-term" survival of a significant
percentage (28%) of patients, 47% (8/17), in the past 12 months, all of
whom would have died without it. Therefore we currently recommend a trial
of ventricular assist devices support for most patients who fail to be
weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, deteriorate in the perioperative
period, and as a bridge to transplantation. Long-term survival is
determined by the complications from ventricular assist devices support and
functional status of the remaining myocardium.
ARTICLES
Mechanical support: assist or nemesis?
Department of Surgery, Sharp Memorial Hospital, University of California, San Diego.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D.W. Quinn, T.J.J. Jones, and T.R. Graham Mechanical Circulatory Support Sources of Emboli and Neurological Outcome Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 2000; 4(2): 115 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Curtis, J. T. Walls, R. A. Schmaltz, T. L. Demmy, C. C. Wagner-Mann, and C. A. McKenney Use of Centrifugal Pumps for Postcardiotomy Ventricular Failure: Technique and Anticoagulation Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 61(1): 296 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |