HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DeWall, R. A. Articles by Thevenet, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DeWall, R. A. Articles by Thevenet, A.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 98, 999-1006, Copyright © 1989 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

The Omni design: evolution of a valve

RA DeWall, JM Caffarena Raggio, H Dittrich, D Guilmet, M Morea and A Thevenet
Kettering Memorial Hospital, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.

The Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis has been the subject of an engineering evolution to close the gap between engineering expectations and clinical performance. Advanced engineering development in response to users has narrowed this gap with the Omni design (Omniscience titanium and omnicarbon Pyrolite cages). Our studies on mitral Omniscience valves demonstrated that because anatomic and surgical variations, the anterior orientation was more forgiving than the posterior orientation, resulting in lower thrombotic complications (0.5% versus 3.3% patient- year). A subsequent thicker cuff was used to reduce the probability of anatomic interference and incomplete opening after cardiac recovery. Such findings were also incorporated in the Omnicarbon design. Five European centers implanted 354 patients (198 atrial valve replacement, 115 mitral valve replacement, and 41 double valve replacement with Omniscience valves between August 1984 and January 1986. No restrictive patient selection criteria were used. As of June 1987, 96% of the patients at risk were accounted for. Average follow-up was 1.7 +/- 0.4 years (range, 0.3 to 2.8 years), with a total follow-up of 555 years. There were no cases of structural failure or clinically significant hemolysis. Ninety-one percent of the patients improved one or more functional classes. Actuarial analysis of survival probability at 3 years is 92.5% for atrial valve replacement, 97.9% for mitral valve replacement, and 93.6% overall. There were no late deaths from valve thrombosis or thromboembolism. The actuarial freedom from all thromboembolic events (valve thrombosis, thromboembolism, and transient ischemia) is 97.8% at 2 1/2 years. Through close rapport between user surgeons and designers, the evolution of a valve with improved performance becomes a reality.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Edwards, G. B. Russell, A. F. Edwards, J. W. Hammon Jr, A. R. Cordell, and N. D. Kon Results of valve replacement with omniscience mechanical prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 665 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Abe, K. Kamata, K. Kuwaki, K. Komatsu, and S. Komatsu Ten Years' Experience of Aortic Valve Replacement With the Omnicarbon Valve Prosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1996; 61(4): 1182 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text]