JTCS St. Jude Medical
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:1259-1260
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Invited Commentary

Discussion

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Dr Ludwig Karl von Segesser (Lausanne, Switzerland). I wish to congratulate Dr Carey and colleagues for providing the manuscript and for bringing up a very important issue, which might become even more critical if CABG numbers are decreasing in the future.

I believe that most of us are happy to learn that the high-volume surgeon in a low-volume environment does like others in that environment. The main concern is, of course, that if a problem occurs, the surgeon gets most of the blame, and much less goes to the other team members. I am wondering whether further subgroup analysis is possible and whether there is a difference between the high-volume generalist cardiac surgeon compared with the high-volume CABG specialist? For the future, it might be important not to be focused on CABG alone. I am also wondering whether the low-volume surgeons are treated unfavorably in the statistical analysis here. If you have a surgeon doing 10 CABG procedures a year and he loses 1 patient, his mortality will be 10%, and if he does not lose a patient in the second year, it will be 0%, and therefore the mean will be 5%. Even if he loses no patient in the following 8 years, his mortality in this analysis will be 5% compared with that of others who lose 1 of 100 patients, where the mortality will be 1%.

I have the following questions. How does a high-volume CABG surgeon perform when he does a few procedures in another high-volume program compared with those who do a lot in the other high-volume program? How does a high-volume surgeon do in CABG, valve, and other procedures compared with a high-volume surgeon doing CABG alone in a high-volume environment, and what about the same for . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article

The "occasional open heart surgeon" revisited
Joseph S. Carey, Joseph P. Parker, Claude Brandeau, and Zhongmin Li
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008 135: 1254-1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.