|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:103-115
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.
SURGERY FOR CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE |
Rochester, Minn.
From the Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Division of Anatomic Pathology, and Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Address for reprints: Gordon K. Danielson, MD, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Abstract
To determine long-term outcome after operation for supravalvular aortic stenosis, we reviewed the case histories of 80 patients who had repair of the localized form (group A) (n = 67) or diffuse form (group B) (n = 13) from 1956 to 1992, including 31 patients with the Williams-Beuren syndrome. Ages ranged from 7 months to 54 years (mean = 12.6 years). Forty-six patients had one or more associated cardiovascular anomalies; the most common was aortic valve stenosis (33.8%). Eighteen patients had 22 previous cardiovascular operations, and 28 patients had one or more additional anomalies repaired during their initial procedure at our institution. In group A, the aortic root was enlarged with a teardrop-shaped patch (n = 61) or a pantaloon-shaped patch (n = 6). In group B, patch enlargement of the aorta was confined to the root (n = 4) or extended into the ascending aorta or aortic arch (n = 7); one patient had a graft placed between the ascending and descending thoracic aorta and one patient had a left ventricularaortic conduit. There were no deaths in group A; two patients in group B in whom patch enlargement was confined to the aortic root died during the operation (2.5%). Follow-up extended to 33.4 years (mean = 14.2 years); there were five late deaths in group A and one in group B. Survival excluding operative mortality was 94% at 10 years and 91% at 20 years. All patients were in functional class I or II. There was no significant difference between patients with a teardrop-shaped or pantaloon-shaped patch in terms of late gradient, survival, or aortic insufficiency. By Cox multivariate model, the only independent predictor of late death for all patients was associated aortic valve disease (p = 0.02), which was also a risk factor for late reoperation (p = 0.02). In group B, overall survival was better in patients who received an extended patch versus aortic root patch only (p = 0.02). We reached the following conclusions: (1) Associated aortic valve disease was strongly correlated with late death and need for reoperation. (2) Both the teardrop-shaped and pantaloon-shaped patch techniques provide excellent long-term relief of localized supravalvular gradients and preservation of aortic valve competence. (3) In diffuse supravalvular aortic stenosis, aortic enlargement should be extended into the ascending aorta or beyond as required to relieve the gradient; some patients may require a graft or conduit. (4) Early surgical intervention before development of coronary artery disease or ventricular dysfunction may improve long-term survival. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1994;107:103-15)
Surgical reconstruction of the aortic root for congenital discrete supravalvular aortic stenosis (SAS) was first performed in 1956 by Kirklin
1 at the Mayo Clinic, using a teardrop-shaped patch, and later reported by several other groups.
2-4 In 1964 Shumacker and Mandelbaum
5 and McGoon at the Mayo Clinic independently treated patients with the diffuse form of SAS with an extended patch into the entire ascending aorta. Doty, Polansky, and Jenson,
6 in 1977, reported use of a pantaloon-shaped patch for relief of discrete SAS. Although the early and intermediate results of the teardrop-shaped and pantaloon-shaped patch techniques for relief of discrete SAS have been reported to be excellent,
1-10 little long-term follow-up information is available.
11-13 In addition, the rarity of diffuse SAS has made it difficult to obtain satisfactory data on the results of surgical treatment of this lesion. Controversy exists regarding the best operative technique for both lesions. To determine the long-term effects of surgical treatment of discrete and diffuse SAS on left ventricularaortic systolic gradients, need for reoperation, and survival, we analyzed the data of all patients who have had surgical treatment of SAS at the Mayo Clinic.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Between 1956 and 1992, 80 patients underwent operative treatment for congenital SAS at the Mayo Clinic. Case histories of 16 of these patients have been reported previously.
9 The lesions were classified according to the system devised by Lev,
14 who first reported that SAS may occur as a localized lesion (Fig. 1) and as part of generalized hypoplasia of the entire ascending aorta and beyond (Fig. 2). The latter lesion was designated diffuse in this report. Sixty-seven patients (83.8%) had localized SAS and 13 (16.2%) had diffuse SAS. Seven patients with the diffuse form had a previously described anatomic variant in which narrowing of the aorta extended into the aortic arch and additional stenoses were present in the proximal arch vessels (Fig. 3).
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the majority of patients, intraoperative pressures were measured in the cardiac chambers before (n = 66; 82.5%) and after (n = 78; 97.5%) repair. Information concerning coronary arterial anatomy was obtained from preoperative angiography and from intraoperative inspection of the coronary arteries and their ostia. Early echocardiography (within 2 weeks of operation) was performed in 17 patients (21.3%). Late echocardiography or late cardiac catheterization (or both) was performed in 50 patients (62.5%) and 14 patients (17.5%), respectively. Follow-up data were collected by examination and questionnaires completed by patients/parents and referring physicians. Telephone calls were made to complete data acquisition when necessary.
Means and standard deviations were calculated. Variables that were analyzed with the
2 or Student's t test were as follows: age; sex; presence of associated cardiovascular anomalies; presence of associated aortic valve disease; form of SAS (localized or diffuse); preoperative NYHA functional class; previous cardiovascular operations; preoperative, intraoperative prerepair, intraoperative postrepair, and late postoperative left ventricularaortic gradients; presence of Williams-Beuren syndrome; teardrop- versus pantaloon-shaped patch; aortic root patch only versus extended patch repair; year of operation; need for previous or concomitant aortic valvotomy; and need for previous or concomitant aortic valve replacement. A p value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered significant. Variables with a p value less than 0.1 were reanalyzed by multivariate stepwise regression analysis. Survival estimates were made with the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons between survival distributions were made with the log-rank and Gehan Wilcoxon tests.
Operative techniques
Standard techniques for cardiopulmonary bypass were used. Profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest were added for some patients who underwent placement of ascendingdescending aorta grafts or aortic arch reconstructions. Cold potassium crystalloid or blood cardioplegia has been used for myocardial protection since 1977. In patients with the discrete form of SAS, an oblique incision was made in the ascending aorta and extended well down into the noncoronary sinus of Valsalva (Fig. 4). This incision divided the stenotic ridge, which was then excised as much as possible, especially any portions blocking access to the left or, less frequently, right sinus, to release and lengthen the coronary cusp(s) and to relieve coronary ostial obstruction. Care was taken to avoid damage to the aortic valve apparatus and the coronary ostia. Subsequently, a generous teardrop-shaped patch was sutured into the incision to increase the circumference of the aorta. Although Ivalon, Teflon, and Dacron fabric were used as patch material in the past, untreated autologous pericardium, which has given excellent early and late results, has been our prosthetic material of choice for many years.
18
|
|
|
|
|
The types of material used in the 78 patients who underwent patch enlargement of the aorta are listed in
Table VII. Two patients with the Williams-Beuren syndrome had patch enlargement of the main pulmonary artery and bifurcation and the main pulmonary artery and left pulmonary artery, respectively (
Table VI, patch enlargement of branch pulmonary artery).
|
Early results
There were two hospital deaths (2.5%). Both resulted from intraoperative cardiac failure in the early part of the series and both patients had diffuse SAS and associated anomalies. In both patients, patch enlargement of the aorta had been confined to the root and proximal ascending aorta.
The mean preoperative, intraoperative prerepair, intraoperative postrepair, and late postoperative systolic pressure gradients between the left ventricle and the ascending aorta are summarized in
Table VIII. Postoperative morbidity included reoperation for persistent bleeding (n = 2) and hemodynamic instability necessitating delayed sternal closure (n = 1).
|
|
|
|
The two operative survivors with diffuse SAS in whom patch enlargement of the aorta had been confined to the aortic root and proximal ascending aorta underwent reoperation for persistent left ventricularaortic gradients of 115 and 75 mm Hg. In the first patient, the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and innominate artery were enlarged with a long Dacron patch, reducing the postoperative left ventriculardescending aortic gradient to 25 mm Hg. In the second patient, a Dacron graft was placed between the ascending and descending thoracic aorta with a side branch to a proximally stenotic innominate artery, completely eliminating the gradient.
Fourteen patients, including the two mentioned earlier, underwent one to four reoperations, the majority for aortic valvular disease (
Table IX). Reasons for mechanical valve rereplacement included outgrowth of the prosthesis, stenosis from pannus formation, and endocarditis. A left ventricularsupraceliac aortic conduit was implanted at reoperation in two patients, one with discrete SAS and additional subaortic and valvular aortic obstructions and one with discrete SAS and valvular aortic obstruction. Risk factors for reoperation by univariate analysis were associated aortic valve disease (p = 0.05), presence of late left ventricularaortic gradient greater than 34 mm Hg (p = 0.05), absence of Williams-Beuren syndrome (p = 0.007), and need for previous or concomitant aortic valvotomy or aortic valve replacement (p = 0.03). By multivariate analysis, the only risk factor for reoperation was associated aortic valve disease (p = 0.02).
|
In both patients in whom a severe pulmonary branch stenosis was relieved by patch enlargement, there was echocardiographic evidence of persisting patency of the pulmonary artery branches. The other 13 patients with unoperated mild or moderate pulmonary branch stenosis remained free of symptoms.
DISCUSSION
The relative rarity of SAS has made it difficult to obtain satisfactory data on the natural history, operative indications, and results of surgical therapy for this lesion. The anatomic features of SAS are variable, ranging from a simple supraaortic ridge to hypoplasia of the entire thoracic aorta and beyond. Archer,
19 in 1878, described an elastic band stretching across and just distal to the insertion of the aortic cusps. Mencarelli,
20 in 1930, reported a stenotic lesion above the aortic valve, which he called "supravalvular stenosis of the aorta." The first clinical report with catheterization data was by Denie and Verheugt
21 in 1958, followed by a report by Morrow and colleagues
22 1 year later. Among the etiologic factors implicated in SAS are idiopathic hypercalcemia, disturbance of vitamin D and calcium metabolism, and rubella,
23-28 but other factors remain unknown. SAS with mental retardation and typical "elfin" facial appearance was first described by Williams, Barratt-Boyes, and Lowe
4 and subsequently by Beuren, Apitz, and Harmjanz.
16 Branch and peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis in association with the same syndrome was described 3 years later by the latter group.
17 Other extracardiac cardiovascular anomalies that have been reported in association with this syndrome include coarctation of the aorta,
29 patent ductus arteriosus,
30 and anomalies of the abdominal aorta and its branches.
29, 31, 32 Associated intracardiac lesions include mitral valve prolapse,
33 ventricular septal defect,
30, 32 and tetralogy of Fallot.
34 Twenty-six of the 28 patients with the nonfamilial form of the Williams-Beuren syndrome in our series were mentally retarded, versus one of the three patients with the familial form of the Williams-Beuren syndrome. A lesser prevalence of mental retardation in the familial form has been reported previously.
31, 35
In all patients with SAS, inspection of the aortic root to rule out obstruction of coronary blood flow is an essential part of the operation. We believe resection of as much supravalvular membrane as possible is also important not only to improve access of blood to the coronary ostia but also to free up the cusps to allow greater mobility. Some patients have anatomic coronary ostial stenosis that may necessitate separate patch enlargement or extension of the aortic patch into the stenotic coronary ostium.
36-38 We prefer pericardium for patch material because it is pliable and there is little bleeding from the suture holes. In addition, we have not encountered hemolysis or failure of endothelialization of the patch associated with transient ischemic attacks, as we and others have noted with Teflon or Dacron patches.
6 We
18 have not encountered any late aneurysm formation when pericardium has been used to enlarge the aortic root.
Our experience indicates that enlargement of the aortic root with a teardrop-shaped patch leads to excellent long-term results, although this technique may not completely restore the geometry of the aortic sinuses. Important technical points include using a teardrop-shaped rather than a diamond-shaped patch and a patch large enough to restore the aorta to a normal diameter. Patching of two
6 or three
39 of the sinuses or circular excision of the stenosis at the level of the sinotubular junction followed by end-to-end anastomosis of the ascending aorta to the aortic root
40 may restore a more anatomic configuration to the aortic root; our data, however, do not suggest there is any demonstrable early or late advantage to multiple sinus patches with regard to the incidence of persistent or recurrent SAS. The assessment of gradients between the left ventricle and ascending aorta in patients with teardrop- or pantaloon-shaped patches was complicated by the presence of associated aortic valve disease in 20 patients. Nevertheless, the gradients in both groups were low and there was no significant difference between them, even with a considerably longer follow-up in the group of patients with a teardrop-shaped patch. Similarly, there was no difference between the two groups with regard to late development of aortic insufficiency. However, some patients with restricted mobility of the right or left cusps or obstructed blood flow to the coronary ostia may benefit from a two- or three-sinus patch.
Until two decades ago, surgical treatment for the diffuse form of SAS was regarded as an unrewarding undertaking.
8, 9, 41 Current techniques including extension of patches into the aortic arch or beyond, as needed to relieve all gradients, and the use of grafts or conduits when necessary now provide excellent early and long-term results.
5, 12, 42 We agree with others
6, 12 that all operations should begin in the aortic root so that any necessary repairs of the aortic valve, subaortic area, or coronary ostial obstructions can be performed. For stenoses extending beyond the aortic arch, we prefer a graft between the ascending aorta and the descending aorta with side branches to any stenotic arch vessels rather than a left ventricularaortic conduit. Although such a conduit usually completely relieves the gradient between left ventricle and distal aorta, the long-term durability of conduits, particularly those with porcine valves, has been disappointing, and late infection and aneurysm formation have also been reported.
43, 44
Associated aortic valve disease was found to be the major determinant of late death and need for reoperation. In a few cases, reoperation was postponed or delayed, resulting in death from congestive heart failure or death from myocardial failure at the time of reoperation. Accordingly, we believe it is appropriate to reoperate whenever the associated aortic valve disease becomes hemodynamically important, as is done for patients with aortic valve disease without SAS.
Another aspect of coronary arterial disease in SAS is the potential for coronary artery dilatation and injury resulting from exposure of the coronary arteries to elevated pressures proximal to the supravalvular ridge, as seen in 48.8% of our patients. The aortic root hypertension may cause enhanced intimal thickening and accelerated atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries, as found in all six of our autopsied patients. Thickening of the intima and media was found as early as 3 years of age, and all older patients had extensive coronary artery disease with associated myocardial fibrosis and healed infarctions. Two patients in our series underwent concomitant or subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting for coronary artery disease at 22 and 51 years of age, respectively, and one patient died of a myocardial infarction at 39 years of age. These findings illustrate that early treatment of SAS is desirable to prevent this complication.
Repair of severe pulmonary branch stenosis as part of the Williams-Beuren syndrome was performed in two of 15 patients with such stenoses, and adequate long-term patency was maintained in both. The severity of pulmonary branch and peripheral stenoses may lessen with growth of the patient, especially in the mild forms, but some of the severe forms, especially those with peripheral pulmonary stenosis, will not improve or will progress with time.
45-47
Appendix: DISCUSSION
Dr. Joseph J. Amato (New Hyde Park, N.Y.).
We have used both the classic approach of patch repair for SAS and the pantaloon approach as proposed by Dr. Doty. Most recently, however, we have also used the technique described by Dr. Gerald Brom and most recently written about by Dr. John Meyers of Hershey. The aorta is transected and three equally shaped triangular patches are used to enlarge the stenotic region, after which the aorta is reattached. The reason for this approach is that there is less insufficiency because of the equality of the cusps. For the sake of completeness, I wonder if the authors have used this technique or any modification thereof and would wish to comment upon it.
Dr. van Son.
We have not used the technique you mentioned, which was first proposed by Brom in 1978 and later modified by Meyers, Waldhausen, and colleagues. Our experience indicates that enlargement of the aortic root with the teardrop-shaped or pantaloon-shaped patch techniques both lead to excellent long-term results in terms of survival, late gradient, and late aortic insufficiency, although we realize that the latter techniques may not perfectly restore the geometry of the aortic root. We believe that, in general, it is not necessary to use the Brom technique, although this modification may have application in selected patients with significant distortion of the aortic root, often with apposition of the aortic valve cusps to the obstructing ridge of the SAS with resulting coronary ostial stenosis, because this technique effectively separates the aortic cusps from the commissures. A minority of patients with severe ostial stenosis may require additional patch enlargement of the coronary ostium, either by extension of the aortic patch or by a separate patch.
Mr. Jaroslav F. Stark (London, United Kingdom).
In our experience with SAS we have encountered problems with long stenosis of the left and right pulmonary arteries. On angiogram or echocardiogram these arteries have abnormal pulsation right to the hilum. Even patching these arteries from the bifurcation to the hilum did not relieve the stenosis. I noticed that you reported 15 pulmonary artery stenoses but only two procedures. Could you comment please?
Dr. van Son.
In our series there were 15 patients with discrete pulmonary artery stenoses, primarily of the proximal branches. In four of these patients the stenosis extended beyond the upper lobe bifurcation. Only two patients had proximal stenoses severe enough to warrant operative treatment and both received patches. In the other 13 patients, the stenoses were either mild or moderate or too far peripherally, and nothing was done to them. At late postoperative follow-up, there was echocardiographic and angiographic evidence of improvement of the degree of stenosis in the majority of patients who did not have surgical relief of the stenosis. In both patients who had surgical relief of their pulmonary stenosis, the pulmonary arteries were widely patent. These results indicate that the presence of discrete pulmonary artery stenosis should generally not be a contraindication to surgical relief of SAS. We agree that diffuse hypoplasia of the pulmonary arteries poses a difficult problem and some of these lesions may be beyond surgical relief.
Dr. Luiz Carlos Bento de Souza (São Paulo, Brazil).
Since 1991, in five patients with a localized form of SAS, we have used a technical modification that permits an enlargement of the aortic root with autologous ascending aortic wall, which avoids prosthetic material.
During the last meeting of this Association, Dr. John Meyers from Hershey, Pennsylvania, reported his experience with this technique.
After transecting the aorta just above the stenotic site and trimming off the thickened tissue, we make three vertical incisions in the Valsalva sinuses. Distally we make three longitudinal incisions corresponding to the commissural parts, obtaining three flaps that will be sutured in the Valsalva sinuses.
At the end we have a sinusoidal line of suture going up on the commissures and down on the Valsalva sinuses. With this technique, we are able to operate early in the patient's life, avoiding complications on the aortic valve, coronary arteries, and left ventricular hypertrophy and the possibility of inadequate growth of the aortic root.
In our most recent eight Jatene procedures for transposition of the great arteries, we have used this technique to reconstruct the pulmonary artery trunk to prevent pulmonary stenosis in the late postoperative period.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the opportunity of including data from patients operated on by Dr. J. W. Kirklin, Dr. D. C. McGoon, and Dr. R. B. Wallace.
Footnotes
Read at the Seventy-third Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Chicago, Ill., April 25-28, 1993. ![]()
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Arnaiz, D. Koolbergen, A. Adsuar, and M. G. Hazekamp Surgery for supravalvular aortic stenosis - the three-patch technique MMCTS, September 15, 2008; 2008(0915): 2329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Turley, J. Dark, and P. C. Adams Acquired supravalvular aortic stenosis: a late complication of replacement of the ascending aorta Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 690 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Aboulhosn and J. S. Child Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction: Subaortic Stenosis, Bicuspid Aortic Valve, Supravalvar Aortic Stenosis, and Coarctation of the Aorta Circulation, November 28, 2006; 114(22): 2412 - 2422. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, P. Vijay, and M. W. Turrentine Surgical repair of congenital supravalvular aortic stenosis in children Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 21(1): 50 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stamm, I. Friehs, S. Y. Ho, A. M. Moran, R. A. Jonas, and P. J. del Nido Congenital supravalvar aortic stenosis: a simple lesion? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 19(2): 195 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. McElhinney, E. Petrossian, W. Tworetzky, N. H. Silverman, and F. L. Hanley Issues and outcomes in the management of supravalvar aortic stenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 562 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stamm, C. Kreutzer, D. Zurakowski, G. Nollert, I. Friehs, J. E. Mayer, R. A. Jonas, and P. J. del Nido FORTY-ONE YEARS OF SURGICAL EXPERIENCE WITH CONGENITAL SUPRAVALVULAR AORTIC STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 1999; 118(5): 874 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Hazekamp, A.-P. Kappetein, P. H. Schoof, J. Ottenkamp, M. Witsenburg, H. A. Huysmans, and A. J. J. C. Bogers BROM’S THREE-PATCH TECHNIQUE FOR REPAIR OF SUPRAVALVULAR AORTIC STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1999; 118(2): 252 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pretre, U. Arbenz, P. R. Vogt, and M. I. Turina Application of successive principles of repair to correct supravalvular aortic stenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1999; 67(4): 1167 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Delius, M. M. Samyn, and D. M. Behrendt Should a bicuspid aortic valve be replaced in the presence of subvalvar or supravalvar aortic stenosis? Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1998; 66(4): 1337 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Grahame-Clarke, W B Pugsley, and R H Swanton Supravalvar aortic stenosis: unexpected findings at surgery Heart, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 627 - 628. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stamm, J. Li, S. Y. Ho, A. N. Redington, and R. H. Anderson THE AORTIC ROOT IN SUPRAVALVULAR AORTIC STENOSIS: THE POTENTIAL SURGICAL RELEVANCE OF MORPHOLOGIC FINDINGS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1997; 114(1): 16 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Yilmaz, M. Arslan, E. Ozal, H. Byngol, H. Tatar, and O. Y. Ozturk Coronary Artery Aneurysm Associated With Adult Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1996; 62(4): 1205 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. M. van Son, V. M. Reddy, M. D. Black, H. Rajasinghe, G. S. Haas, and F. L. Hanley MORPHOLOGIC DETERMINANTS FAVORING SURGICAL AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY VERSUS PULMONARY AUTOGRAFT AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN CHILDREN J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1996; 111(6): 1149 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. M. van Son, W. D. Edwards, and G. K. Danielson Pathology of coronary arteries, myocardium, and great arteries in supravalvular aortic stenosisReport of five cases with implications for surgical treatment J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1994; 108(1): 21 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||