|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:1542-1543
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
Sunnybrook Health Science Center
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
To the Editor:
Porcine bioprosthetic valves are frequently used in patients requiring valve replacement for whom anticoagulant therapy is not advisable. These valves are known to undergo gradual deterioration, ultimately leading to failure. The 10-year rate of freedom from structural valve failure on the left side of the heart for porcine valves is 70% to 80%.
1-3 Younger patient age has been shown to be an independent predictor of structural valve deterioration.
1 Valves implanted on the right of the heart are generally expected to be more durable than those implanted on the left side.
2 Kawachi and colleagues
4 recently reported on a total of 27 Hancock porcine bioprostheses implanted in the right side of the heart (pulmonary, 4, tricuspid, 6, mitral and tricuspid, 13; and aortic, mitral, and tricuspid, 4) with failure of only 1 valvein the tricuspid position in a 9-year-old boy. However, time to failure in this patient was not mentioned. In 3 patients with tricuspid valve replacement younger than 15 years, their Hancock valves (except for that in the 9-year-old patient mentioned) have continued to function well at 11.3 and 14.8 years after operation.
We have been concerned about the fate of bioprostheses in the tricuspid position in younger patients. We recently reoperated on a young man with early failure of a Hancock II porcine valve (Medtronic Heart Valves, Irvine, Calif.) implanted in the tricuspid position. This 20-year-old patient had undergone tricuspid valve replacement 1 year earlier for traumatic disruption of the tricuspid valve as a result of a snowmobile accident. A 33 mm Hancock II bioprosthesis was inserted with preservation of the tricuspid apparatus. The patient did well for 6 months, when he began to report fatigue and exertional dyspnea. Doppler echocardiographic studies suggested that the tricuspid insufficiency was the result of primary leaflet dysfunction.
The patient underwent another operation 1 year after his initial operation. There was no evidence for perivalvular dehiscence or sequelae of endocarditis. However, two of the three valve leaflets appeared shrunken and retracted, with a gross central triangle of insufficiency (Fig. 1). The valve was excised and replaced with a 29 mm St. Jude Medical mechanical prosthesis (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.). The patient's postoperative course was uneventful.
|
The article of Kawachi and associates
4 suggests that porcine bioprostheses in the tricuspid position are relatively durable. This report of premature leaflet dysfunction should act as a caution regarding the natural history of tissue valves in young patients. The possible consequences of a second tricuspid valve replacement should be balanced against those inherent in initial insertion of a mechanical prosthesis.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |