JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
David P. Taggart
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asimakopoulos, G.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asimakopoulos, G.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:797-799
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.


BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS

EFFECTS OF POSTERIOR PERICARDIOTOMY ON THE INCIDENCE OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND CHEST DRAINAGE AFTER CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

George Asimakopoulos, MD, Renato Della Santa, MD, David P. Taggart, MD(Hons), FRCS


Oxford, United Kingdom

Received for publication June 25, 1996 accepted for publication Sept. 11, 1996. Address for reprints: D. P. Taggart, MD (Hons), FRCS, Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgeon, The John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT), mainly in the form of atrial fibrillation (AF), occurs in up to 40% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and although usually benign can cause hemodynamic instability, prolong hospital stay and increase costs, and, rarely, predispose to a cerebrovascular accident.Go 1

Pericardial effusions are incriminated in the development of SVT after CABG.Go 2 Posterior pericardiotomy has recently been reported to reduce the incidence of echocardiographically defined pericardial effusions from 40% in a control group to 8% in a pericardiotomy group with a simultaneous reduction in the incidence of SVT from 36% to 8%.Go 3 That study was not, however, strictly randomized and neither the number of participating surgeons nor their method or methods of myocardial protection was specified.

In a prospective, randomized trial we tested the hypothesis that posterior pericardiotomy reduces the postoperative incidence of SVT by improving pericardial drainage.

Methods.
One hundred consecutive patients undergoing isolated first-time CABG by one surgeon (D. P. T.) were randomized to receive posterior pericardiotomy or no posterior pericardiotomy (control group). Patients with unstable angina were included and left ventricular (LV) function was assessed at cardiac catheterization and defined as good (ejection fraction >50%), moderate (ejection fraction 30% to 50%), or poor (ejection fraction <30%).

Operation.
All operations were done with the use of intermittent global ischemia with the systemic temperature allowed to drift to 34° C. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established with a roller pump and nonpulsatile flow between 2.0 and 2.4 L {bullet} m {bullet} min. A Cobe CML membrane oxygenator and alpha-stat arterial carbon dioxide tension management were used and arterial pressure maintained at 50 to 80 mm Hg.

Pericardiotomy.
Patients randomized to the pericardiotomy group received a 4 cm posterior pericardial incision below the left inferior pulmonary vein parallel and posterior to the phrenic nerve as described by Mulay and colleagues.Go 3

Drainage.
Anterior mediastinal and left pleural drains were routinely placed with suction at 10 mm Hg. Hourly blood loss was recorded until drain removal the following day.

Postoperative electrocardiography.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) was monitored continuously for the first 48 hours after operation and subsequently by 12-lead ECGs as required. In the event of SVT the serum potassium level was corrected if less than 4.5 mmol/L. If the SVT persisted sotalol or digoxin administration was begun depending on LV function.

Statistics.
The analysis of the data was done with SPSS software. Clinical data are expressed as the mean plus or minus the standard deviation. Differences were analyzed with a t test or a Mann-Whitney test for nonparametric data. The differences were considered to be significant for p values <0.05.

Results.
The groups were well matched with regard to age, sex, medications received (particularly beta blockers), LV function, and unstable angina necessitating administration of intravenous heparin and nitrates Go(Table I). The groups were similar with respect to the number of grafts (including the use of internal thoracic and radial artery grafts), ischemic time, and cardiopulmonary bypass time Go(Table I).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative characteristics of the two groups
 
Postoperative factors.
There was one hospital death in each group in patients with severely impaired LV function. One patient underwent reoperation because of bleeding from a side branch of the internal thoracic artery. One patient in each group required insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump but both patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital. The groups were similar with regard to duration of mechanical ventilation.

Incidence of SVT.
There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the incidence of SVT or AF, which occurred in 13 patients (26%) in the pericardiotomy group and in 10 patients (20%) in the control group Go(Table II). In the two groups the combined incidence of SVT was 5 patients of 45 patients younger than 60 years old and 18 of 55 patients older than 60 years (p < 0.01).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Postoperative data in the two groups
 
Chest drainage.
The fenestration group had significantly greater chest drainage at 12 hours (831 ± 303 ml vs 660 ± 238 ml) and in total (1032 ± 367 ml vs 813 ± 282 ml) compared with values in the control group Go(Table II).

Discussion.
The cause of postoperative SVT is not entirely clear. In a study of 1666 patients undergoing isolated CABG the overall incidence of AF was 28%, with the major occurrence 2 days after the operation.Go 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses identified increased patient age to be the dominant factor promoting AF and multivariate analysis showed that postoperative beta-blocker therapy conveyed considerable protection against AF (p = 0.001) but was less effective in older patients.Go 4

Pericardial effusion has also been implicated in the development of AF,Go 2 and Mulay and colleaguesGo 3 reported a dramatic reduction in the incidence of pericardial effusions and SVT with a posterior pericardial incision. Their findings were, however, weakened by nonrandomization of the patients and failure to describe either the number of surgeons involved or the method or methods of myocardial protection used.

In our study prospective randomization and the fact that all operations were done by one surgeon resulted in two similar groups with respect to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. The incidence of SVT was not statistically different in the two groups and occurred in 10 patients (20%) in the control group and 13 (26%) in the fenestration group. The overall incidence of SVT of 23% is similar to the 19% incidence previously reported from this unit also with the use of intermittent global ischemia.Go 5 The observation that increased age may be the most important factor for the development of AF is supported in the current study. In the two groups combined the incidence of SVT was 5 patients of 45 patients younger than 60 years old and 18 of 55 patients older than 60 years (p < 0.01).

Our study demonstrated a significantly greater pleural drainage in the posterior pericardiotomy group both at 12 hours and in total, which implies that this does result in more effective pericardial drainage but does not reduce the incidence of AF. It is unlikely that increased drainage was the result of bleeding from the pericardial incision because the edges were cauterized and specifically checked for bleeding.

There are two potential limitations of our study. First, we did not perform continuous ECG monitoring after 48 hours unless there was clinical suspicion of cardiac arrhythmia. The aim of our study was, however, only to detect persistent "clinically relevant" AF that would necessitate medication. Second, we did not perform echocardiography to quantify the incidence or size of any pericardial effusions. Mulay and colleaguesGo 3 used echocardiography to confirm pericardial effusions in 8% of patients with a posterior pericardiotomy and in 40% of control patients (p < 0.001) and concluded that pericardiotomy reduced the incidence of pericardial effusions and SVT. Although the increased chest drainage in the posterior pericardiotomy group confirms that this maneuver results in more effective pericardial drainage, posterior pericardiotomy does not reduce the incidence of SVT and is not associated with any other difference in outcome. Unless clinical benefit of improved pericardial drainage is confirmed the routine performance of posterior pericardiotomy cannot be recommended.

Footnotes

From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oxford Heart Center, The John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. Back

References

  1. Pires LA, Wagshal AB, Lancey R, Huang SK. Arrhythmias and conduction disturbances after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: epidemiology, management, and prognosis [Review]. Am Heart J 1995;129:799-808.[Medline]
  2. Angelini GD, Penny WJ, El-Ghamary F, et al. The incidence and significance of early pericardial effusion after open heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1987;1:165-8.[Abstract]
  3. Mulay A, Kirk AJB, Angelini GD, Wisheart JD, Hutter JA. Posterior pericardiotomy reduces the incidence of supra-ventricular arrhythmias following coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:150-2.[Abstract]
  4. Fuller JA, Adams GG, Buxton B. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: is it a disorder of the elderly? 1989;97:821-5.
  5. Butler J, Chong JL, Rocker GM, Pillai R, Westaby S. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison of cardioplegia versus intermittent aortic cross-clamping. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993;7:23-5.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
W. L Baker and C M. White
Post-Cardiothoracic Surgery Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Preventive Strategies
Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2007; 41(4): 587 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
L. L. Creswell, J. C. Alexander Jr., T. B. Ferguson Jr., A. Lisbon, and L. A. Fleisher
Intraoperative Interventions: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 28S - 35S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. Ege, E. Tatli, S. Canbaz, M. Cikirikcioglu, H. Sunar, B. Ozalp, and E. Duran
The Importance of Intrapericardial Drain Selection in Cardiac Surgery
Chest, November 1, 2004; 126(5): 1559 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B. Farsak, S. Gunaydin, H. Tokmakoglu, O. Kandemir, C. Yorgancioglu, and Y. Zorlutuna
Posterior pericardiotomy reduces the incidence of supra-ventricular arrhythmias and pericardial effusion after coronary artery bypass grafting
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 22(2): 278 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Yorgancioglu, B. Farsak, H. Tokmakoglu, and S. Gunaydin
An unusual experience with posterior pericardiotomy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 18(6): 727 - 727.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. Kuralay, E. Ozal, U. Demirkilic, and H. Tatar
EFFECT OF POSTERIOR PERICARDIOTOMY ON POSTOPERATIVE SUPRAVENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS AND LATE PERICARDIAL EFFUSION (POSTERIOR PERICARDIOTOMY)
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1999; 118(3): 492 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
David P. Taggart
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asimakopoulos, G.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asimakopoulos, G.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS