JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Browdie, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Browdie, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:810
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Materials for tracheoplasty: Which work? Which are best?

D. A. Browdie, MD, R. V. Bernstein, MD, R. Johnson, MD


Fargo, ND 58122

To The Editor:

We read with interest the report by Niwa and associatesGo 1 of their clinical experience in infants and adults undergoing esophageal tracheobronchoplasty for a variety of congenital and acquired tracheal lesions. In their discussion these authors expressed the view that on occasion homologous pericardium may not be strong enough to serve as patch material for tracheoplasty procedures.

At the risk of overestimating the values of anecdotal observations, we can report that lyophilized homograft pulmonary artery patches have been used in two infants undergoing anterior tracheoplasties. These patients, aged 5 and 3 months, required simultaneous correction of congenital heart lesions (interrupted aortic arch type B with ventricular septal defect and pulmonary artery sling, respectively). These procedures were done according to methods and management protocols previously described by others.Go Go 2–4 In addition, fibrin sealant was used for suture-line sealing.

In both of these patients, progress has been satisfactory over intervals of 33/4 and 23/4 years, respectively. Bronchoscopies were done at 11/2 year and 2 years in the first patient and at 1 years in the second. These studies showed slight tracheal irregularity, no stenosis, and apparent epithelialization (biopsies not done) (patches were placed adventitia outward). Faint calcifications in the region of these patches appeared by 6 to 12 months on chest x-ray films.

As the authors noted in their discussion, several patch materials can "work" on tracheoplasty procedures. In infants similar to those described here, perhaps lyophilized pulmonary artery homograft can be added to the list. However, it remains to be determined which material is best and in what circumstances. For this reason, we appreciated this report of esophageal tracheobronchoplasty and note the need for further investigations in this area.

References

  1. Niwa H, Masaoka A, Yamakawa Y, Hara F, Kondo K, Fukai I, et al. Esophageal tracheobronchoplasty for diseases of the central airway. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996:112:124-9.
  2. Edmunds LH Jr, Norwood WI, Low LW. Atlas of cardiothoracic surgery. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1990:154-5, 104-5.
  3. Idriss FS, Delson SU, Ilbawi MM, Gerson CR, Tacker GF, Holinger L. Tracheoplasty with pericardial patch for extensive tracheal stenosis in infants and children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984:88:527-6.
  4. Hamansohn DA, Kesler KA, Turentine MW, Mahomed Y, Means L, Maff B, et al. Anterior pericardial tracheoplasty for congenital tracheal stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991:102:710-6.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Bonacchi, E. Prifti, G. Giunti, G. Frati, and G. Sani
Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 460 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Bauer, M. Pasic, R. Ewert, and R. Hetzer
Ministernotomy versus complete sternotomy for coronary bypass operations: No difference in postoperative pulmonary function
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2001; 121(4): 702 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Taguchi, T. Niibori, and K. Moro
Use of three-dimensional computed tomography images in deciding the approach for ministernotomy operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 1090 - 1093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Aris, M. L. Camara, J. Montiel, L. J. Delgado, J. Galan, and H. Litvan
Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a prospective, randomized study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 67(6): 1583 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Aris
Reversed ""C"" ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 67(6): 1806 - 1807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Oda, T. Togo, K. Sakuma, T. Saito, N. Sato, and S. Sato
Looped device for inferior vena cava taping through a right parasternal approach
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1999; 67(4): 1188 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. B. Luciani, C. Piccin, and A. Mazzucco
Minimal-access median sternotomy for repair of congenital heart defects
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1998; 116(2): 357 - 358.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. Morishita, K. Kuwaki, H. Sato, and T. Abe
Minimal-access redo aortic valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1998; 115(6): 1390 - 1390.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. K. W. Tam
Minimal-access redo aortic valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1998; 115(6): 1390 - 1391.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. Walterbusch
Partial sternotomy for cardiac operations
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1998; 115(1): 256 - 257.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat and A. P. C. Yim
Minimal-access or minimally invasive surgery?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1998; 115(1): 258 - 258.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Browdie, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Browdie, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS