JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zwart, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zwart, H.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:686
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Partial sternotomy: A mini approach for maxi exposure

Hans Zwart, MD


Suite 322
580 Lincoln Park Blvd.
Kettering, OH 45429-3493

To the Editor:

In response to a letter to the Editor by Moreno-Cabral in the Journal (1997;113:810-1), I want to endorse his enthusiasm for the partial lower sternotomy. I, too, have been frustrated with the limitations of exposure of the heart via left and right anterolateral thoracotomy. In contrast, partial lower sternotomy up to the second intercostal space with bilateral transection of the sternum at the top of the incision allows adequate exposure for a wide variety of operations.

Over the past 3 months, I have performed 29 operations using partial lower sternotomy. All patients received from one to five coronary bypasses; in 26, the left internal thoracic artery was used and, in one, the right internal thoracic artery. In addition, two had resection of a left ventricular aneurysm, one replacement of both the aortic and mitral valves, and two replacement of the aortic valve. In one patient (coronary bypass plus double valve replacement), the sternal incision was extended to the first intercostal space and the sternum was transected at that level.

Postoperative pain was less than in patient with anterolateral thoracotomies. Blood loss was less than in patients with complete sternotomy. The skin incision was shorter than with complete sternotomy and only slightly longer than that need for the anterolateral thoracotomy approach.

Partial sternotomy is a worthwhile alternative to complete sternotomy and has many of the advantages of other minimally invasive techniques.





This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zwart, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zwart, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS