|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:871
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
Department of Anatomy and Embryologya
Leiden University
P.O. Box 9602
2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
Reply to the Editor:
We thank Professor Anderson for his interest in our recent article.
1 First of all, we must apologize for having missed the article by Sutton, Ho, and Anderson
2 in our literature survey, and consequently for not having discussed it, while preparing our article. Should the wrong impression have been evoked that we deliberately omitted the article, we can assert that this is not our style.
The article by Sutton, Ho, and Anderson
2 is certainly interesting and deservedly emphasizes the role and build of the interleaflet triangles. Indeed, these authors deserve credit for mentioning "a very thin layer of elastic tissue on the luminal surface" of the interleaflet triangles. What surprised us most, however, during our investigations is that this elastic tissue appears to be isolated from the other areas of elastic tissue. Although we have to consider that a more refined technique may show the elastic tissue to be continuous, we do think it is interesting from a developmental point of view. Likewise, as Professor Anderson suggests, the conus tendon is intriguing and has our attention in our morphogenetic studies.
With respect to the subpulmonary infundibulum, we are well aware that the subpulmonary infundibulum is not made of the ventricular septum proper. We (M.M.B. and A.C.G-de G.) have investigated this issue extensively and also clarified its morphogenesis.
3-6 We are somewhat surprised by Professor Anderson's comment, as he was the one who invited us, some years ago, to write a review on the morphologic and embryologic correlations of the outflow tract.
3 The most important message from the latter article was that because of the asymmetric configuration of the level of the arterial orifices, already present in early embryonic hearts, the separation process results in the formation of the posterior wall of the pulmonary infundibulum, "rather than a septum between both outflow tracts." Figs. 1, 3, and 4 of that article emphasize that this (muscular) part of the pulmonary infundibulum is adjoining the ascending aorta, from which it is separated "by loose fibrous tissue and can thus not be called an `actual' outlet septum." In the discussion of that article, we stated that our findings were in agreement with the observations of Anderson, Becker, and Tynan,
7 who said that "it is not a septal structure at all." It appears that modesty with "self-quotation" does not always pay. In our recent paper
1c on the pulmonary and aortic roots, we did not repeat this discussion because we assume that surgeons performing the Ross procedure do know these morphologic details. When mentioning that part of the pulmonary anulus inserts into "the septal part of the right ventricular myocardium," we used this designation to distinguish its location which, strictly speaking, is the myocardium immediately above the ventricular septum proper. To avoid misunderstanding, we will consider a more strict formulation in the future.
There remains, however, one issue to be discussed. We do not agree with Professor Anderson's statement that the autograft in a Ross procedure "does not possess a septal component." Most of the autograft is taken out of the freestanding myocardium in a plane approximately perpendicular to the subpulmonary myocardial surface. The most critical part of dissecting the autograft, however, concerns the portion that is scooped out in a plane between slightly oblique and parallel to the surface on the right ventricular side of the curved anterior part of the ventricular septum, thereby avoiding the septal branch of the left coronary artery. Should the section be made perpendicular to this part of the septum, the chances of damaging the coronary branch would be increased and the lumen of the left ventricle anterior to the subaortic area would be opened. Thus this part of the myocardium is not "freestanding" but an "actual" part of the ventricular septum. Unfortunately, the illustration accompanying Professor Anderson's letter does not provide a proper view of this area. Morphogenetically, we consider this part of the septum to be the most cranial part of the primary septum formed by the primary fold.
12/8/84948
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |